Dermatologists play a significant and multifaceted role in caring for sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients, an expansive population that includes individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, asexual, queer, transgender, and gender nonconforming and those with differences in sex development. Multiple social determinants, including stigma and discrimination in health care and a lack of knowledgeable clinicians, have created health inequities for SGM individuals, leading the National Institutes of Health in 2016 to designate SGM individuals as a healthdisparity population. 1,2 Sexual and gender minority patients also face dermatology-specific disparities, ranging from increased rates of skin cancer among sexual minority men to higher rates of human papillomavirus infection among sexual minority women. 3 To provide excellent care for SGM individuals, dermatologists must be able to deliver culturally competent care to SGM individuals with routine dermatologic conditions and address their population-specific health needs. These health needs include, but are not limited to, the screening for and prevention of certain sexually transmitted infections among high-risk SGM individuals, the management of cutaneous effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy, and the use of minimally invasive, gender-affirming procedures. 3,4 In this issue of JAMA Dermatology, Jia and colleagues 5 address a key component of improving clinical care and mitigating health disparities for SGM individuals-dermatology graduate medical education.To our knowledge, this is the first published study of SGMspecific curricula in dermatology residency training. This is an important area of inquiry because, although the Association of American Medical Colleges issued recommendations for the inclusion of SGM health-related content in undergraduate medical education in 2014, 6 implementation of these recommendations has been variable. In 2011, a survey found that students received a median of 5 hours of SGM health-related content in medical school curricula 7 ; as of 2018, medical students continued to report that they received inadequate education in SGM health. 8 A review of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) Basic Dermatology Curriculum, an online curriculum used by medical students, found minimal SGM healthrelated content. 9 Thus, residents entering dermatology graduate medical education training may have had little exposure to SGM health-related topics. If we expect future dermatologists to provide culturally and clinically competent care to SGM individuals, we must consider graduate medical education training a critical period to prepare dermatologists to address SGM health.