2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual and Gender Minority Curricula Within US Dermatology Residency Programs

Abstract: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients face many health challenges, including higher burdens of skin cancer, sexually transmitted diseases, and complications associated with hormone therapy or gender-affirming surgery. 1 Improving clinician knowledge of SGM patients' health needs may improve quality of care for this population. 2 The goal of this study was to assess what SGMspecific health topics are covered in dermatology residency programs to identify possible gaps and guide improvements.Methods | In Aug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventeen percent of residency programs offer no SGMrelated education. Programs reported devoting a mean percentage of 1.0% of didactic curriculum and 0.7% of clinical exposure to SGM-related topics, and this varied 14 which were similar to our findings reported in this study. Our results were also consistent with the most commonly reported barriers to graduate curricular TNG training (limited curricular time, lack of topic-specific competency among faculty, and insufficient institutional support).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seventeen percent of residency programs offer no SGMrelated education. Programs reported devoting a mean percentage of 1.0% of didactic curriculum and 0.7% of clinical exposure to SGM-related topics, and this varied 14 which were similar to our findings reported in this study. Our results were also consistent with the most commonly reported barriers to graduate curricular TNG training (limited curricular time, lack of topic-specific competency among faculty, and insufficient institutional support).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The instrument was adapted from previously reported instruments (Supplementary Data S1). [12][13][14] An expert panel from multiple institutions consisting of an OHNS department chair, an OHNS residency program director, two OHNS faculty members, and a medical student reviewed the instrument. The panel reached consensus on survey draft revisions, yielding the final instrument.…”
Section: Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 A survey of 123 residency programs highlighted that 20% had no curricular topics relevant to sexual and gender minorities. 20 Furthermore, only one of 293 (0.3%) of the American Academy of Dermatology and Society of Pediatric Dermatology's online case modules for medical students mentions LGBT patients. 29 Insufficient time and lack of faculty expertise were reported as the most common barriers to integrating LGBT health content in dermatology residency curricula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Insufficient time and lack of faculty expertise were reported as the most common barriers to integrating LGBT health content in dermatology residency curricula. 20 A short, online, interactive session has the potential to overcome these educational barriers for dermatology trainees across institutions due to its virtual nature, allowing it to be disseminated to a broad audience outside of clinic hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation