2016
DOI: 10.4003/006.033.0213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Differentiation ofOctopus hubbsorum(Mollusca: Cephalopoda) Using Body Dimensions and the Shape and Size of the Stylets: A Traditional and Geometric Morphometric Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group 3 is the CB station, as illustrated in Figures 10a and 11, and detailed in Table A2. The discrimination analysis of female and male cephalopods yielded significant findings [24][25][26]. The percentage of discriminant accuracy for seven groups of females ranged from 55% to 100%.…”
Section: Morphological Variations Of S Inermismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group 3 is the CB station, as illustrated in Figures 10a and 11, and detailed in Table A2. The discrimination analysis of female and male cephalopods yielded significant findings [24][25][26]. The percentage of discriminant accuracy for seven groups of females ranged from 55% to 100%.…”
Section: Morphological Variations Of S Inermismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Largely due to the specifics of the taxa themselves, the shells of different groups of mollusks have been studied extremely unevenly. For example, in studies of the modern cephalopod shells, GM-based analysis has only been applied once (López-Galán and del Carmen Alejo-Plata, 2015). In this research, traditional morphometrics and landmark-based GM analysis were applied to test gender differences in Octopus hubbsorum stylets.…”
Section: Shellsmentioning
confidence: 99%