2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual dimorphism in the vertebral wedging of the human lumbar vertebrae and its importance as a comparative framework for understanding the wedging pattern of Neanderthals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the most recent reconstruction of the La Chapelle aux Saints Neandertal suggests vertebral curvatures similar to modern humans 14 and this indicates that a better fossil documentation of lumbar spine anatomy in Neandertals is needed. Importantly, a recent study accounting for a wide range of population variability in modern humans, identified consistently and significantly more pronounced lordotic wedging in Neandertal L5 of Kebara 2, Shanidar 3, and La Chapelle aux Saints 41 together with a more hypo-lordotic wedging in upper lumbar vertebra. Accordingly, this could suggest a completely different position of the lumbar spine within the trunk, with yet unclear biomechanical implications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, the most recent reconstruction of the La Chapelle aux Saints Neandertal suggests vertebral curvatures similar to modern humans 14 and this indicates that a better fossil documentation of lumbar spine anatomy in Neandertals is needed. Importantly, a recent study accounting for a wide range of population variability in modern humans, identified consistently and significantly more pronounced lordotic wedging in Neandertal L5 of Kebara 2, Shanidar 3, and La Chapelle aux Saints 41 together with a more hypo-lordotic wedging in upper lumbar vertebra. Accordingly, this could suggest a completely different position of the lumbar spine within the trunk, with yet unclear biomechanical implications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Lumbar lordosis varies considerably in human populations 12,[39][40][41] and affects locomotor capacities. It has been shown that greater lordosis facilitates shock absorption, for example, when running 34 , while weaker lordosis produces a more forwards orientation of the pelvis, which is beneficial for leg return during sprinting 31 .…”
Section: Evolutionary Anatomical Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spinopelvic relationships also shed light on the human sex differences in lumbar lordosis and vertebral wedging, which tend to be greater in females than in males 47,52,53 . Whitcome et al 47 proposed that this dimorphism, which was already present in early Homo and partly even in Australopithecus, evolved as an adaptation to mitigate the shearing forces generated by foetal load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These spinopelvic relationships also shed light on the human sex differences in lumbar lordosis and vertebral wedging, which tend to be greater in females than in males [ 58 , 74 , 75 ]. Whitcome et al [ 58 ] proposed that this dimorphism, which was already present in early Homo and partly even in Australopithecus , evolved as an adaptation to mitigate the shearing forces generated by foetal load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%