2002
DOI: 10.3989/pirineos.2002.v157.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual dimorphism of pyrenean chamois (<i>Rupicapra p. pyrenaica</i>) based on skull morphometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the measured morphometric parameters between the male and female Saneen goats showed no significant differences. This result was in agreement with other previous reports in various goat breeds (García-González & Barandalla, 2002;Samuel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Comparing the measured morphometric parameters between the male and female Saneen goats showed no significant differences. This result was in agreement with other previous reports in various goat breeds (García-González & Barandalla, 2002;Samuel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…not only body size but also a wealth of phenotypic traits, such as the presence of a ruff, horns or antlers in males, as well as hair/plumage colour patterns, Eisenberg, 1981; Bradbury & Andersson, 1987; for syntheses: Clutton‐Brock, 1989; Pérez‐Barbería, Gordon & Pagel, 2002). Conversely, chamois is a near‐monomorphic species in horn size and shape, as well as coat colour (North‐Eastern chamois, Couturier, 1938; Knaus & Schröder, 1983; South‐Western chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica , Lovari & Scala, 1984; Garcia‐Gonzalez & Barandalla, 2002) and weakly dimorphic in body weight (adult males are about 25% heavier than adult females, with the peak of >30% among prime adults, e.g. Bassano, Perrone & Von Hardenberg, 2003; Toïgo & Gaillard, 2003; Garel et al , 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size differences can contribute to the overall degree of horn shape dimorphism found between sexes through the effect of allometry. Basal perimeter and the total length of the horns are significantly higher in males than in females , García-González and Barandalla 2002, Bassano et al 2003, and the effect of this difference depends on horn growth throughout the individual's life. Given that the greatest horn shape differences between the sexes can be found in older ages, it can be argued that the influence of horn elongation on the degree of curvature may introduce allometric variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To date, most studies on chamois horns focused on sexual size dimorphism (SSD) (Pérez-Barbería et al 1996, Scala and Lovari 1984, García-González and Barandalla 2002, Garel et al 2009). By contrast, horn curvature received relatively little attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%