Sexual dimorphism of the posterior cervical spine muscle attachments

Abstract

Cervical spinal injury and neck pain are common disorders with wide physical implications. Neck pain and disability are reported to occur in females more often than in males, and chronic or persistent neck pain after whiplash is twice as common in females. Female athletes also sustain a higher percentage of concussions compared to male athletes. Still, while sexual differences in clinical presentation and outcome are well‐established, the underlying etiology for the disparity remains less clear. It is well‐established that the origin and insertion landmarks of posterior neck muscles are highly variable, but we do not know if these interindividual differences are associated with sex. Expanding our knowledge on sexual dimorphism in the anatomy of the cervical muscles is essential to our understanding of the possible biomechanical differences between the sexes and hence improves our understanding as to why females suffer from cervical pain more than males. It is also of paramount importance for accurate planning of posterior cervical spine surgery, which cuts through the posterior cervical musculature. Therefore, our main objective is to characterize the anatomy of posterior neck musculature and to explore possible sexual differences in the location of their attachment points. Meticulous posterior neck dissection was performed on 35 cadavers, 19 females, and 16 males. In each specimen, 8 muscle groups were examined bilaterally at 45 osseous anatomical landmarks. Muscles and their attachment sites were evaluated manually then photographed and recorded using Microscribe Digitizer technology built into 3D models. A comparison of attachment landmarks between males and females for each muscle was conducted. Out of the eight muscles that were measured, only two muscles demonstrated significant sex‐related anatomical differences—Spinotranversales (splenius capitis and cervicis) and Multifidus. Male Spinotransversales muscle has more attachment points than female. It showed more cranial insertion points in the upper cervical attachments (superior nuchal line, C1 posterior tubercle, and mastoid process) and more caudal insertion points in the spinous processes and transverse processes of the lower cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae. Thus, the male subjects in this study exhibited a greater coverage of the posterior neck both cranially and caudally. Female Multifidus has more attachment points on the spinous processes and articular processes at middle and lower cervical vertebrae and at the transverse processes of the upper thoracic vertebrae. All remaining muscles exhibited no sexual differences. Our findings highlight, for the first time, a sexual dimorphism in attachment points of posterior cervical musculature. It reinforces the notion that the female neck is not a scaled version of the male neck. These differences in muscle attachment could partially explain differences in muscle torque production and range of motion and thus biomechanical differences in cervical spine stabilization between sexes. It sheds a ...

Efficacy of NHP66 Bioactive Cage on Patients with Cervical Spine Injury in Short-Track Speed Skating

“…According to relevant data, the risk of serious CSI in STSS is as high as 10%-20% [ 4 ]. CSI, often accompanied by varying degrees of dystonia and pathological reflex that result in motor, sensation, and sphincter dysfunction, may even cause disability and paralysis in athletes due to nerve compression in severe cases [ 5 ]. Therefore, the management of CSI requires extreme caution, and a complete cure is of particular importance for athletes because of its potential disruption to their careers [ 6 ].…”

Ultrasonography, Microcomputed Tomography, and Macroscopic Preparation in an Anatomical Study of the Thoracic Limb of the Golden-Headed Lion Tamarin (Leontopithecus chrysomelas)

“…Focal changes in echogenicity are easier to detect in muscles because the adjacent, normal parenchyma can be compared [4,6,40]. Longitudinal and transverse US images of the muscles show hypoechoic structures with small hyperechoic fibres, which allow distinction of each muscle group or even the demonstration of sexual dimorphism, e.g., when analysing the scapula level muscle [17]. Ultrasound imaging enables measurement of the muscle thickness and diameter of the muscle from the outer borders.…”

“…CT is often used to analyse the skeletal system [11,12], whereas ultrasonography is used for soft tissues such as muscles [13][14][15][16]. However, many authors of anatomical studies still use traditional methods, which involve the preparation of dead tissues [17,18]. This may suggest that, despite the great advantages of computer-assisted imaging, research based on the preparation of cadavers is still needed.…”

Neck proprioception assessment with a laser beam device: reliability in participants without neck pain and differences between participants with and without neck pain

“…Additionally, data from 20 participants with NSCNP in a previous study [13] were utilized. The participants were age-and sex-matched between the two groups, with the 'individual matching' metho d [14], to avoid confounding related to either of those anthropometric variables, previously shown to affect proprioception measures [15] or sexrelated cervical muscles' orientatio n [16].…”