2018
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy283.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual function and quality of life in a national cohort of bilateral testicular cancer survivors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Five studies assessed anxiety (3 reported prevalence, while 3 reported severity) using the HADS-A (four studies) or the Spielberger State Anxiety Scale 10-item inventory (SSAS-10). The reported prevalence of borderline abnormal or abnormal anxiety was 6.9%, 33 20% 32 and 21.1%. 34 Two studies 29 , 33 found mean HADS-A scores of 3.2 to 6.16 (scale range 0–21), and another study 30 reported SSAS-10 scores of 16.2 to 18.6 (scale range unclear).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Five studies assessed anxiety (3 reported prevalence, while 3 reported severity) using the HADS-A (four studies) or the Spielberger State Anxiety Scale 10-item inventory (SSAS-10). The reported prevalence of borderline abnormal or abnormal anxiety was 6.9%, 33 20% 32 and 21.1%. 34 Two studies 29 , 33 found mean HADS-A scores of 3.2 to 6.16 (scale range 0–21), and another study 30 reported SSAS-10 scores of 16.2 to 18.6 (scale range unclear).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Each study included between 29 and 2260 participants. The total number of participants across all studies was 2898 (one study 31 is excluded from this count as they are the same participants from another publication, 32 but each study reported different outcomes). The overall participant response rate average was 58.8% (range: 7–93%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, 21 full-text articles were retrieved and evaluated for eligibility based on the inclusion criteria. Seven articles were excluded as a result of not fulfilling our inclusion criteria [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 10 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. Finally, 14 studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%