2010
DOI: 10.1080/09541440903160492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual harassment in the context of double male dominance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on Gruber's concept of double dominance, de Haas and Timmerman (2010) found that the nature of male-dominated work environments mediated the relationship between numerical male dominance and SH. This and other research has shown that SH is more problematic in blue-collar male-dominated settings such as fire-fighting, where jobs are typically highly physical and where cultural norms associated with sexual bravado, sexual posturing and the denigration of female behaviour are sanctioned, than in white-collar male-dominated occupations such as accounting (Chamberlain et al 2008;de Haas and Timmerman 2010). Other research by Handy (2006) in New Zealand and Timmerman and Bajema (1999), who reviewed European studies, has also shown that organizational norms and cultures, such as the level of sensitivity to the problem of balancing work and personal obligations, and the extent to which the culture is employeerather than job-oriented, are more important in predicting the frequency of SH incidents than organizational sex ratios.…”
Section: Organizational Contexts Where Sh Occursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on Gruber's concept of double dominance, de Haas and Timmerman (2010) found that the nature of male-dominated work environments mediated the relationship between numerical male dominance and SH. This and other research has shown that SH is more problematic in blue-collar male-dominated settings such as fire-fighting, where jobs are typically highly physical and where cultural norms associated with sexual bravado, sexual posturing and the denigration of female behaviour are sanctioned, than in white-collar male-dominated occupations such as accounting (Chamberlain et al 2008;de Haas and Timmerman 2010). Other research by Handy (2006) in New Zealand and Timmerman and Bajema (1999), who reviewed European studies, has also shown that organizational norms and cultures, such as the level of sensitivity to the problem of balancing work and personal obligations, and the extent to which the culture is employeerather than job-oriented, are more important in predicting the frequency of SH incidents than organizational sex ratios.…”
Section: Organizational Contexts Where Sh Occursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional and meta-analytic studies consistently demonstrate that SH is more prevalent in male-dominated occupations and work contexts than in gender-balanced or femaledominated workplaces (Illies et al 2003;Willness, Steel and Lee 2007). However, it is not the organizational sex-ratio of the workplace that renders SH problematic, but rather organizational environments that are hierarchical, especially those where cultural norms are associated with sexual bravado and posturing and where the denigration of feminine behaviors is sanctioned de Haas and Timmerman 2010). Hence, training should explicitly address gender-relevant cultural issues (Zippel 2003).…”
Section: Prevention Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moral Disengagement in Sexual Harassment 11 Haas & Timmerman, 2010), the MDiSH items are situated in the general work context in order to capture a wider array of employment sectors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%