2017
DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2017.1365303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Health Research Among Youth Representing Minority Populations: To Waive or Not to Waive Parental Consent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of the delay came from working with multiple IRBs that did not all agree on the study protocol; several others have faced similar challenges (Kaur, ; Mammel & Kaplan, ). In Brawner and Sutton (), we provide an in‐depth description of the IRB challenges faced and measures undertaken to resolve them; this publication may be particularly useful for individuals conducting sexual health research with youth and/or making determinations about the necessity of parental consent waivers. Partnering with a non‐IRB affiliated youth legal expert was a novel strategy (suggested by the local IRBs), and helped reach resolution to move the research forward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Part of the delay came from working with multiple IRBs that did not all agree on the study protocol; several others have faced similar challenges (Kaur, ; Mammel & Kaplan, ). In Brawner and Sutton (), we provide an in‐depth description of the IRB challenges faced and measures undertaken to resolve them; this publication may be particularly useful for individuals conducting sexual health research with youth and/or making determinations about the necessity of parental consent waivers. Partnering with a non‐IRB affiliated youth legal expert was a novel strategy (suggested by the local IRBs), and helped reach resolution to move the research forward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the request of the local IRBs, we contacted the Juvenile Law Center to conduct a youth‐focused third‐party review of the protocol to help support a decision. The attorneys provided the service free of charge and concluded that the study's consent provisions were consistent with the Mental Health Procedures Act and the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act; see (Brawner & Sutton, ). Second, at the time of enrollment the census for the target demographic at the ten partnering provider sites was relatively low, and some agencies only had one Black youth who met the preliminary screening criteria—the intervention was designed to be delivered in groups of six to eight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future testing in an adequately powered optimization trial is planned. Alongside the intervention activities, the research team established a precedent for youth participation in sexual health research without parental consent to protect their confidentiality and ensure the representative advancement of HIV/STI prevention science [ 45 ]. Additional information on Project GOLD is here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03348813?titles=Project+GOLD&rank=1 .…”
Section: Interventions Developed By Mari Investigatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recruitment and retention of adolescent couples is even more challenging given that these relationships can often be short-lived and also warrant special protection considerations. For example, research involving minors (individuals 17 years and under) requires consideration of parental consent, protection of minor's privacy regarding sexual activity and romantic relationship involvement, minors' capacity to consent to research participation, and adolescents' ability to consent to receipt of SRH services without parental permission [15][16][17]. SRH research that includes adolescent couples also warrants attention to local laws regarding age of sexual consent and mandated reporting of abuse [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%