2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Segregation in Juvenile New Zealand Sea Lion Foraging Ranges: Implications for Intraspecific Competition, Population Dynamics and Conservation

Abstract: Sexual segregation (sex differences in spatial organisation and resource use) is observed in a large range of taxa. Investigating causes for sexual segregation is vital for understanding population dynamics and has important conservation implications, as sex differences in foraging ecology may affect vulnerability to area-specific human activities. Although behavioural ecologists have proposed numerous hypotheses for this phenomenon, the underlying causes of sexual segregation are poorly understood. We examine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…obs.). These groups likely have some foraging area overlap with females, particularly juvenile males (as seen at Enderby Island; Leung et al 2012Leung et al , 2014. In addition, there are large numbers of other marine carnivores which forage in these areas, including New Zealand fur seals Arctocephalus fosteri (>20 000 individuals; Lalas 2008) that could have an overlap or be competing for prey (Lalas & Webster 2014) whereas fur seal numbers are limited at the Auckland Islands (pers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…obs.). These groups likely have some foraging area overlap with females, particularly juvenile males (as seen at Enderby Island; Leung et al 2012Leung et al , 2014. In addition, there are large numbers of other marine carnivores which forage in these areas, including New Zealand fur seals Arctocephalus fosteri (>20 000 individuals; Lalas 2008) that could have an overlap or be competing for prey (Lalas & Webster 2014) whereas fur seal numbers are limited at the Auckland Islands (pers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the large scale of differences found in at sea movements between AI and Otago juvenile females, using different filters did not affect the validity of the comparison between the sites. Satellite locations from animals at AI were corrected and interpolated with a state-space model, fitted into a hierarchical Bayesian context [47], [48]. We ran the models using WinBUGS [49] and R [50].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ran the models using WinBUGS [49] and R [50]. The analyses were conducted hierarchically by grouping tracks from multiple individuals within the same age group [48]. To fit the model, two Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains were run at a four hour time step for 40 000 iterations, with a burn-in of 20 000.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, prey aggregations may change location due to variations in oceanographic features, thus obligating predators to change their foraging areas, see [22]. Second, individuals usually segregate and change their foraging locations in order to decrease intra-specific resource competition ( [23]). Finally, SASL are considered to be a generalist predator, which means that they consume different prey species [24].…”
Section: Real Datamentioning
confidence: 99%