1996
DOI: 10.2307/3802067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Segregation in Rocky Mountain Mule Deer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
76
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) The predation hypothesis and evidence based on breeding phenology The predation-risk hypothesis has received massive support in explaining sexual segregation in ungulates: females with young often select safer habitat even at the expense of forage quality (Bergerud et al 1984;Francisci et al 1985;Shank 1985;Festa-Bianchet 1988;Berger 1991;Miquelle et al 1992;du Toit 1995;Main & Coblentz 1996;Bleich et al 1997;Villaret et al 1997). In our study, social segregation and habitat segregation peaked when calves were newborn and probably most prone to predation, and was delayed in Norway compared with France, demonstrating the utility of accounting for breeding phenology in sexual-segregation studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) The predation hypothesis and evidence based on breeding phenology The predation-risk hypothesis has received massive support in explaining sexual segregation in ungulates: females with young often select safer habitat even at the expense of forage quality (Bergerud et al 1984;Francisci et al 1985;Shank 1985;Festa-Bianchet 1988;Berger 1991;Miquelle et al 1992;du Toit 1995;Main & Coblentz 1996;Bleich et al 1997;Villaret et al 1997). In our study, social segregation and habitat segregation peaked when calves were newborn and probably most prone to predation, and was delayed in Norway compared with France, demonstrating the utility of accounting for breeding phenology in sexual-segregation studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the 'predation-risk hypothesis' Ruckstuhl & Neuhaus 2002) states that anti-predator behaviour shapes sexual segregation because females and especially offspring are more vulnerable to predation than are larger males (Bowyer 1984;Miquelle et al 1992;Bon & Campan 1996;Main & Coblentz 1996;Bleich et al 1997). Predictions are that females, especially those with offspring, should choose safe habitats (vegetation cover or escape habitat) even at the expense of forage quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many dimorphic ungulates (e.g., red deer: CluttonBrock et al 1987;Conradt 1999; Alpine ibex Capra ibex ibex: Bon et al 2001; Rocky Mountain mule deer Odocoileus hemionus hemionus: Main and Coblentz 1996; white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus: Kie and Bowyer 1999), sexual segregation is common outside the breeding season. While feral goats (Capra hircus) are no exception, the level of segregation in the population inhabiting the Isle of Rum is modest and rather unstable (Shi et al 2005), with adult males and females forming mixed groups even outside of breeding season.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These areas are constituted of deciduous woods, shrubs, and meadows providing adequate availability of food. According to Main and Coblentz (1996), polygynous male ungulates tend to engage in foraging and behavioural patterns that maximize body condition before rut. Males exploit areas where nutritious resources are abundant in all seasons, excluding rut, because they need to compete successfully for mates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%