2007
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arm017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual selection in a moth: effect of symmetry on male mating success in the wild

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Otronen () found significant directional selection for smaller claspers in the fly Dryomyza anilis , whereas Koshio et al . () found no significant directional sexual selection operating on them in Elcysma westwoodii moths. Similar to the present study, paired and unpaired male yellow dung flies ( Scathophaga stercoraria ) did not differ in clasper size (Blanckenhorn, Kraushaar & Reim, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Otronen () found significant directional selection for smaller claspers in the fly Dryomyza anilis , whereas Koshio et al . () found no significant directional sexual selection operating on them in Elcysma westwoodii moths. Similar to the present study, paired and unpaired male yellow dung flies ( Scathophaga stercoraria ) did not differ in clasper size (Blanckenhorn, Kraushaar & Reim, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Despite the importance of genital claspers to male fitness in many arthropods (Moreno-García & Cordero, 2008), a general pattern of the strength, direction, and form of sexual selection operating on them has yet to emerge because only a handful of studies have studied them in a behavioural ecological context. For example, Otronen (1998) found significant directional selection for smaller claspers in the fly Dryomyza anilis, whereas Koshio et al (2007) found no significant directional sexual selection operating on them in Elcysma westwoodii moths. Similar to the present study, paired and unpaired male yellow dung flies (Scathophaga stercoraria) did not differ in clasper size (Blanckenhorn, Kraushaar & Reim, 2003).…”
Section: The Form and Strength Of Selectionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This possible cause of negative size-FA scaling is referred to as the ''quality heterogeneity'' hypothesis (Polak and Starmer 2005). The predicted negative relationship between size and FA have been reported for traits subject to mate choice and intrasexual selection (Møller 1990(Møller , 1992c(Møller , 1993c(Møller , 1994Møller and Höglund 1991;Manning and Chamberlain 1993;Schlüter et al 1998;Koshio et al 2007), and Møller and Cuervo (2003) provide data suggesting that the size-FA relationship becomes more negative as intensity of sexual selection for trait size increases across species.…”
Section: Developmental Instability Should Be Negatively Correlated Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative associations have been found between FA and a range of correlates of reproductive success, including sexual attractiveness (Møller 1992a;Thornhill 1992a;Gong and Gibson 1996;Sheridan and Pomiankowski 1997;Simmons et al 2004;Brown et al 2005), female reproductive rate (Forkman and Corr 1996), competitive ability (Thornhill 1992b;Møller and Zamora-Muñoz 1997;Bateman 2000), copulation probability and/or rate (Møller and Zamora-Muñoz 1997;Carchini et al 2000;Santos 2001;Cooley 2004;Koshio et al 2007), mating speed (Radesäter and Halldórsdóttir 1993;Polak and Stillabower 2004), ejaculate quality (Manning et al 1998;Roldan et al 1998;Farmer and Barnard 2000;Gomendio et al 2000;Firman et al 2003), competitive fertilization success (Otronen 1998), courtship gift quality (Thornhill 1992b), and estimated lifetime breeding success (Harvey and Walsh 1993;Kruuk et al 2003).…”
Section: Developmental Instability Should Be Negatively Correlated Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these assumptions appears to be supported, on average. Studies often (but do not always) find negative associations between asymmetry and reproductive success (Koshio et al 2007;Vishalakshi and Singh 2008;Jaffe and Moritz 2010;Pavkovic-Luaic and Kekie 2011). Similarly, studies often (but do not always) find negative associations between asymmetry and measures of survival probability (Leung and Forbes 1996;Moller 1999;Vishalakshi and Singh 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%