2012
DOI: 10.1177/0011392111426646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexuality, power and the sociology of the internet

Abstract: The internet is an increasingly important enabler and mediator of sexual relations in society. It has begun to transform older modes of knowing, experiencing and organizing sexuality. In light of an emerging social science literature, this article considers internetmediated sexuality and its consequences for theorizing power. It looks at three ideal typical strands of power in relation to sexuality: the constitutive, the regulatory and the unequal. It considers empirically based discussions alongside broader t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This may have positive and negative implications for power and control dynamics between sex workers and their clients. In turn, these could influence condom use among female sex workers, particularly in resource-limited settings (Van Doorn 2011; Aube-Marice et al 2012; Bricknell 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may have positive and negative implications for power and control dynamics between sex workers and their clients. In turn, these could influence condom use among female sex workers, particularly in resource-limited settings (Van Doorn 2011; Aube-Marice et al 2012; Bricknell 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am working within a deconstructionist perspective that puts those aspects in a more complex web of relations that involve not only conscious but also unconscious aspects of desire in the production of identity. In that sense, this paper is closer in theoretical approach to recent works in the field of queer theory and geographies of sexualities that deal with digital sexualities (Brickell, 2012;McGlotten, 2013;McLelland, 2002;Mowlabocus, 2010;Nash, Gorman-Murray, 2016). Butler and Lacan, like other post-structuralist authors, opened the path for a sophisticated theoretical background which does not reduce the study of otherness to simply identitarian perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Hence, young Thai women’s expressions of sexual interest and date-making through mobile phones and the Internet have resulted in a moral panic, whereby social institutions condemn such actions and produce discourses and discursive practices aimed at explaining young women’s online sexual expressions. For example, young girls who use the Internet may be branded ‘not good women’ (Bosch 2011; Brickell 2012). Young Thai women’s online sexuality is mostly controlled by criticism of its negative consequences in the mass media or through public policies, which rest upon the assumption that young women’s use of online media puts them at risk of developing sexual- and reproductive-health problems or of becoming prey to males looking to take advantage of them (Chantong et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%