SFC inside IEC 61499

Riedl, Matthias; Diedrich, Christian; Naumann, Frank

doi:10.1109/etfa.2006.355392

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This approach however does not allow creating distributed control nor reusing FBs. Additionally, translations of IEC 61131programs to IEC 61499-models have been performed for FB networks [17] and for SFC [18]. IEC 61499-models were compared to statecharts and Petri nets in [19], resulting in an approach to integrate Petri nets and IEC 61499 [20].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distributed implementation of Grafcets through IEC 61499

Miguel-Escrig

Romero-Pérez

Wiesmayr

et al. 2020

2020 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Grafcet is a standardized model for describing the behavior of systems which is popular among automation engineers. As the Grafcet standard excludes implementation details, the models are typically translated to automation software. Such software was traditionally programmed in one of the languages specified in IEC 61131-3. Nowadays, automation software is increasingly modelled in IEC 61499 which facilitates designing distributed control systems. In this paper, we define a standardized translation methodology, so that automation engineers can benefit from the advantages of IEC 61499 while continuing to use Grafcet. We discuss the differences between Grafcet and IEC 61499. We translated a Grafcet model into an IEC 61499 application to illustrate the process and derive guidelines for application designers. For the core concepts of Grafcet, we present the corresponding structure in IEC 61499.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distributed implementation of Grafcets through IEC 61499

Miguel-Escrig

Romero-Pérez

Wiesmayr

et al. 2020

2020 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, parallel SFC steps are allowed in IEC 61131-3 but no concurrent ECC is defined in the IEC 61499 standard. This is not considered in this paper, however a solution is proposed by Riedl et al [42]. The other issue of the migration process is related to treating the global and program variables used in the PLC code.…”

Section: Mapping Rulementioning

confidence: 99%

“…An IEC 61499 basic function block (BFB) is defined as: If the original program is written in the sequential function chart (SFC), the SFC can be converted to the ECC inside a basic function block [42]. Each SFC step is mapped to an EC state.…”

Section: Mapping Rulementioning

confidence: 99%

Migration From PLC to IEC 61499 Using Semantic Web Technologies

Vuorinen

Rautiainen

Paulasto‐Kröckel

2014

IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern, Syst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…One possible way to implement the SFC logic within the event-driven FB is to develop an equivalent composite FB, as it was proposed in [10]. In the following section we consider another way.…”

Section: A Equivalent Event-driven Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%