“…Surprisingly, we have found that most previous studies regarding SGIP1 either inadvertently used SGIP1 instead of SGIP1α or used different SGIP1 isoforms indiscriminately (Supplementary Table S1). For example (854 a.a.) (Hollopeter et al, 2014;Dvorakova et al, 2021;Mishra et al, 2021) and (806 a.a) (Reider et al, 2009;Stimpson et al, 2009;Henne et al, 2010;Umasankar et al, 2014;Hájková et al, 2016;Ma et al, 2016) mouse SGIP1 isoforms were used indiscriminately in many studies, although the 806 isoform lacks the additional regions in the MP and C-terminal regions. In addition, in humans, instead of the 859 a.a. isoform that contains both additional regions listed above, an (828 a.a.) (Trevaskis et al, 2005;Dergai et al, 2010;Shimada et al, 2016;Petko et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018) isoform that lacks the above additional region in the MP domain was used without distinction in many studies.…”