2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shadowing and Blocking Effect Optimization for a Variable Geometry Heliostat Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other side, the upper limit for the superheated steam temperature is set 520 °C, considering a temperature difference between the hot HTF and the superheated steam of 45 °C. The specific heat, c p , J (kg o C) -1 , and density, ρ, kg m −3 , of HTF were calculated using equation (1) and equation (2) (Cádiz et al, 2015; Kenisarin, 2010):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, the upper limit for the superheated steam temperature is set 520 °C, considering a temperature difference between the hot HTF and the superheated steam of 45 °C. The specific heat, c p , J (kg o C) -1 , and density, ρ, kg m −3 , of HTF were calculated using equation (1) and equation (2) (Cádiz et al, 2015; Kenisarin, 2010):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In power tower systems, the heliostat field is one of the essential subsystems. This is due to its significant contribution to the plant's total investment cost: about 40%-50% of the plant's cost is attributed to the heliostat field [8][9][10][11][12]. The field contributes equally to the plant's overall power losses of about 40% [8,[13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. Carrizosa et al [17] presented a pattern-free heliostat field layout distribution style, obtained by the simultaneous optimization of both the heliostat field (heliostat locations and number) and the tower (tower height and receiver size). Cadiz et al [10] presented shadowing and blocking optimization procedures for a variable-geometry heliostat field. The variable-geometry concept explored by the author allows the possibility of minimizing the cosine losses by rotating the entire field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%