Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics - 1992
DOI: 10.3115/992133.992164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shake-and-bake machine translation

Abstract: Este ~trtfculo presenta un nuevo planteamiento para la traduccidn autom£tica (TA), tlamado Shake-and-Bake (refrito), que aprovecha re

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Hutchins and Somers, 1992). lexicalist approach which relates bags of lexical signs, as in Shake-and-Bake MT (Beaven, 1992;Whitelock, 1992), our transfer approach operates on the level of semantic representations produced by various analysis steps. The output of transfer is a semantic representation for the target language which is input to the generator and speech synthesis to produce the target language utterance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hutchins and Somers, 1992). lexicalist approach which relates bags of lexical signs, as in Shake-and-Bake MT (Beaven, 1992;Whitelock, 1992), our transfer approach operates on the level of semantic representations produced by various analysis steps. The output of transfer is a semantic representation for the target language which is input to the generator and speech synthesis to produce the target language utterance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are at the basis of the generation component of the statistical machine translation models proposed by Brown et al (1990). Bags of complex lexical signs have also been used in the machine translation approach described by Beaven (1992) and Whitelock (1992), called shake-and-bake. As already mentioned, bags are a very succinct representation of finite languages, since they allow encoding of more than exponentially many strings in the size of a bag itself.…”
Section: Representations Of Finite Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include bags of words (Brown et al, 1990) and bags of complex lexical representations (Beaven, 1992;Brew, 1992;Whitelock, 1992), word lattices (Knight & Hatzivassiloglou, 1995;Langkilde & Knight, 1998;Bangalore & Rambow, 2000), and non-recursive context-free grammars (Langkilde, 2000). As will be discussed in detail in Section 2, word lattices and non-recursive context-free grammars allow encoding of precedence constraints and choice among different words, but they both lack a primitive for representing strings that are realized by combining a collection of words in an arbitrary order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Another non-interlingual non-transfer approach is Shake-and-Bake MT (Beaven 1992;Whitelock 1992) which overgenerates TL sentences and symbolically constrains the output by "parsing it." It differs from GHMT in two ways: (1) Shake-and-Bake is a purely symbolic approach and (2) etc.…”
Section: Handling Translation Divergencesmentioning
confidence: 99%