2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11200-009-0016-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shallow earthquakes: Shallower than expected?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This issue has to be studied in more detail elsewhere, similarly to the disagreement between hypocenter and centroid depth found by Zahradnik et al (2008) and Janský et al (2009), but the obtained indication of a very shallow depth is rather strong. The thrust mechanism of Event 1 and the centroid depth similar to the hypocenter depth cannot be ruled out, but with the existing velocity model such a solution seems less likely due to a few polarity disagreements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This issue has to be studied in more detail elsewhere, similarly to the disagreement between hypocenter and centroid depth found by Zahradnik et al (2008) and Janský et al (2009), but the obtained indication of a very shallow depth is rather strong. The thrust mechanism of Event 1 and the centroid depth similar to the hypocenter depth cannot be ruled out, but with the existing velocity model such a solution seems less likely due to a few polarity disagreements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This observation seems to suggest the MT inversion at the location (hypocenter) depth, especially for moderate-size earthquakes, whose hypocenter and centroid are close to each other. However, it has been shown that for shallow crustal events the depth determination is always difficult (Zahradnik, Janský, et al, 2008;Janský et al, 2009Janský et al, , 2012Sokos et al, 2012), hence the MT inversion at the hypocenter depth cannot be generally recommended, unless dense local networks and precise crustal models are available. It might also seem that a compromising solution is to perform an MT inversion only for the deviatoric part (constrain ISO component to zero), determine the centroid depth, and then, keeping the depth value fixed, rerun the inversion using the full MT decomposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%