Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The growing number of well-characterized exoplanets smaller than Neptune enables us to conduct more detailed population studies. We have updated the PlanetS catalog of transiting planets with precise and robust mass and radius measurements and use this comprehensive catalog to explore mass-radius (M-R) diagrams. On the one hand, we propose new M-R relationships to separate exoplanets into three populations: rocky planets, volatile-rich planets, and giant planets. On the other hand, we explore the transition in radius and density between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes around M-dwarfs and compare them with those orbiting K- and FG-dwarfs. Using Kernel density estimation method with a re-sampling technique, we estimated the normalized density and radius distributions, revealing connections between observations and theories on composition, internal structure, formation, and evolution of these exoplanets orbiting different spectral types. First, the substantial 30<!PCT!> increase in the number of well-characterized exoplanets orbiting M-dwarfs compared with previous studies shows us that there is no clear gap in either composition or radius between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes. The "water-worlds" around M-dwarfs cannot correspond to a distinct population, their bulk density and equilibrium temperature can be interpreted by several different internal structures and compositions. The continuity in the fraction of volatiles in these planets suggests a formation scenario involving planetesimal or hybrid pebble-planetesimal accretion. Moreover, we find that the transition between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes appears to happen at different masses (and radii) depending on the spectral type of the star. The maximum mass of super-Earths seems to be close to 10 M$_ for all spectral types, but the minimum mass of sub-Neptunes increases with the star's mass, and is around 1.9 M$_ 3.4 M$_ and 4.3 M$_ for M-dwarfs, K-dwarfs, and FG-dwarfs, respectively. The precise value of this minimum mass may be affected by observational bias, but the trend appears to be reliable. This effect, attributed to planet migration, also contributes to the fading of the radius valley for M-planets compared to FGK-planets. While sub-Neptunes are less common around M-dwarfs, smaller ones (1.8 R$_ < R$_p$ < 2.8 R$_ exhibit lower density than their equivalents around FGK-dwarfs. Nonetheless, the sample of well-characterized small exoplanets remains limited, and each new discovery has the potential to reshape our understanding and interpretations of this population in the context of internal structure, composition, formation, and evolution models. Broader consensus is also needed for internal structure models and atmospheric compositions to enhance density interpretation and observable predictions for the atmospheres of these exoplanets.
The growing number of well-characterized exoplanets smaller than Neptune enables us to conduct more detailed population studies. We have updated the PlanetS catalog of transiting planets with precise and robust mass and radius measurements and use this comprehensive catalog to explore mass-radius (M-R) diagrams. On the one hand, we propose new M-R relationships to separate exoplanets into three populations: rocky planets, volatile-rich planets, and giant planets. On the other hand, we explore the transition in radius and density between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes around M-dwarfs and compare them with those orbiting K- and FG-dwarfs. Using Kernel density estimation method with a re-sampling technique, we estimated the normalized density and radius distributions, revealing connections between observations and theories on composition, internal structure, formation, and evolution of these exoplanets orbiting different spectral types. First, the substantial 30<!PCT!> increase in the number of well-characterized exoplanets orbiting M-dwarfs compared with previous studies shows us that there is no clear gap in either composition or radius between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes. The "water-worlds" around M-dwarfs cannot correspond to a distinct population, their bulk density and equilibrium temperature can be interpreted by several different internal structures and compositions. The continuity in the fraction of volatiles in these planets suggests a formation scenario involving planetesimal or hybrid pebble-planetesimal accretion. Moreover, we find that the transition between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes appears to happen at different masses (and radii) depending on the spectral type of the star. The maximum mass of super-Earths seems to be close to 10 M$_ for all spectral types, but the minimum mass of sub-Neptunes increases with the star's mass, and is around 1.9 M$_ 3.4 M$_ and 4.3 M$_ for M-dwarfs, K-dwarfs, and FG-dwarfs, respectively. The precise value of this minimum mass may be affected by observational bias, but the trend appears to be reliable. This effect, attributed to planet migration, also contributes to the fading of the radius valley for M-planets compared to FGK-planets. While sub-Neptunes are less common around M-dwarfs, smaller ones (1.8 R$_ < R$_p$ < 2.8 R$_ exhibit lower density than their equivalents around FGK-dwarfs. Nonetheless, the sample of well-characterized small exoplanets remains limited, and each new discovery has the potential to reshape our understanding and interpretations of this population in the context of internal structure, composition, formation, and evolution models. Broader consensus is also needed for internal structure models and atmospheric compositions to enhance density interpretation and observable predictions for the atmospheres of these exoplanets.
Migration is a key ingredient in the formation of close-in super-Earth and mini-Neptune systems. The migration rate sets the resonances in which planets can be trapped, where slower migration rates result in wider resonance configurations compared to higher migration rates. We investigate the influence of different migration rates ---set by disc viscosity--- on the structure of multi-planet systems via N-body simulations, where planets grow via pebble accretion. Planets in low-viscosity environments migrate slower due to partial gap opening compared to planets forming in high-viscosity environments. Consequently, systems formed in low-viscosity environments tend to have planets trapped in wider resonant configurations (typically 4:3, 3:2, and 2:1 configurations). Simulations of high-viscosity discs mostly produce planetary systems in 7:6, 5:4, and 4:3 resonances. After the gas disc dissipates, the damping forces of eccentricity and inclination cease to exist and the systems can undergo instabilities on timescales of a few tens of millions of years, rearranging their configurations and breaking the resonance chains. We show that low-viscosity discs naturally account for the configurations of resonant chains, such as Trappist-1, TOI-178, and Kepler-223, unlike high-viscosity simulations, which produce chains that are more compact. Following dispersal of the gas disc, about 95<!PCT!> of our low-viscosity resonant chains became unstable, experiencing a phase of giant impacts. Dynamical instabilities in our low-viscosity simulations are more violent than those of high-viscosity simulations due to the effects of leftover external perturbers (P$>$200 days). About 50<!PCT!> of our final systems end with no planets within 200 days, while all our systems harbour remaining outer planets. We speculate that this process could be qualitatively consistent with the lack of inner planets in a large fraction of the Sun-like stars. Systems produced in low-viscosity simulations alone do not match the overall period ratio distribution of observations, but give a better match to the period distributions of chains, which may suggest that systems of super-Earths and mini-Neptunes form in natal discs with a diversity of viscosities.
M dwarf stars are the most promising hosts for detection and characterization of small and potentially habitable planets, and provide leverage relative to solar-type stars to test models of planet formation and evolution. Using Gaia astrometry, adaptive optics imaging, and calibrated gyrochronologic relations to estimate stellar properties and filter binaries, we refined the radii of 117 Kepler objects of interest (confirmed or candidate planets) transiting 74 single late K-type and early M-type stars, and assigned stellar rotation-based ages to 113 of these. We constructed the radius distribution of 115 small (${\lt} 4\, {\rm R}_{\rm{\oplus}}$) planets and assessed their evolution. As for solar-type stars, the inferred distribution contains distinct populations of ‘super-Earths’ (at ${\sim} 1.3 \, {\rm R}_{\rm{\oplus}}$) and ‘sub-Neptunes’ (at ${\sim} 2.2 \, {\rm R}_{\rm{\oplus}}$) separated by a gap or ‘valley’ at ${\approx} 1.7 \, {\rm R}_{\rm{\oplus}}$ that has a period dependence that is significantly weaker (power-law index of −0.03$^{+0.01}_{-0.03}$) than for solar-type stars. Sub-Neptunes are largely absent at short periods (${\lt} 2 \, {\rm d}$) and high irradiance, a feature analogous to the ‘Neptune desert’ observed around solar-type stars. The relative number of sub-Neptunes to super-Earths declines between the younger and older halves of the sample (median age 3.86 Gyr), although the formal significance is low ($p = 0.08$) because of the small sample size. The decline in sub-Neptunes appears to be more pronounced on wider orbits and low stellar irradiance. This is not due to detection bias and suggests a role for H2O as steam in inflating the radii of sub-Neptunes and/or regulating the escape of H/He from them.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.