2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape restricted nonparametric regression with Bernstein polynomials

Abstract: WANG, JIANGDIAN. Shape Restricted Nonparametric Regression with Bernstein Polynomials. (Under the direction of Sujit K. Ghosh.) There has been increasing interest in estimating a multivariate regression function subject to various shape restrictions, such as nonnegativity, isotonicity, convexity and concavity among many others. The estimation of such shape-restricted regression curves is more challenging for multivariate predictors, especially for functions with compact support. Most of the currently available… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several special cases have been investigated, such as unimodal regression (Frisen 1986), convex regression (Birke and Dette 2007), monotonic regression (Birke and Dette 2008), translation families of a given shape (Kneip and Engel 1995), smoothness (Mammen 1991) or constraints on partial derivatives (Beresteanu 2004). Other methods use general parametric classes of candidate regression functions, such as Bernstein polynomials (Wang and Gosh 2012), splines (Meyer 2008) or epi-splines (Ryan and Wets 2013). The literature dealing with the combined problem of shape-restricted estimation under errors in variables is quite rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several special cases have been investigated, such as unimodal regression (Frisen 1986), convex regression (Birke and Dette 2007), monotonic regression (Birke and Dette 2008), translation families of a given shape (Kneip and Engel 1995), smoothness (Mammen 1991) or constraints on partial derivatives (Beresteanu 2004). Other methods use general parametric classes of candidate regression functions, such as Bernstein polynomials (Wang and Gosh 2012), splines (Meyer 2008) or epi-splines (Ryan and Wets 2013). The literature dealing with the combined problem of shape-restricted estimation under errors in variables is quite rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need to choose g k carefully because estimating a multivariate regression function subject to shape restrictions with compact support is challenging and usually very time-consuming [18]. Here we adopt the bivariate Bernstein polynomials [13], where the shape-restricted regression function estimation is shown to be the solution of a quadratic programming problem [5,18], making it computationally attractive.…”
Section: Inverse Bivariate Reflectance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need to choose g k carefully because estimating a multivariate regression function subject to shape restrictions with compact support is challenging and usually very time-consuming [18]. Here we adopt the bivariate Bernstein polynomials [13], where the shape-restricted regression function estimation is shown to be the solution of a quadratic programming problem [5,18], making it computationally attractive. Furthermore, the Bernstein polynomials approximation naturally selects smooth functions with little computational effort, unlike other nonparametric regression functions (e.g., smoothing spline [4]), which implicitly enforces the smoothness of BRDF as in [2].…”
Section: Inverse Bivariate Reflectance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, imposing a global constraint on the resulting curve is not always straightforward. This may explain why most published research on nonparametric/semiparametric regression subject to a global (or shape) constraint is usually based on other approaches, such as smoothing splines (Ramsay and Silverman, 2005) or nonparametric regression with Bernstein polynomials (Wang and Ghosh, 2012). Notable exceptions include the weighted kernel estimator (otherwise, known as "tilting") proposed by Hall and Huang (2001) and its extension provided in Du et al (2013), where the weights are chosen according to the primary constraint and a few other requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%