2018
DOI: 10.1177/0266666918755427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Share if you care

Abstract: Although the performance of Humanitarian Supply Chain (HSC) receives considerable attention in current literature, measuring HSC performance remains challenging. HSC performance depends largely on the ability to meet the needs of the sufferers which contradicts with current performance measures that focus on input metrics such as donations and expenditures rather than output metrics. In this paper, we address this gap in the literature by examining refugee service performance as perceived by refugees themselve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larson and Kulchitsky (2000) find that information quality is positively and significantly associated with lead time performance, including on-time delivery. It also has a positive and significant relationship with service performance in the context of humanitarian SC (Najjar et al, 2019). Whilst similar results have been indicated in the context of FPSC, further empirical evidence is required to support the claim (Lusiantoro et al, 2018), particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, in which the wide spread of mis-and unverified information emerged, termed as "infodemic" (WHO, 2020; Laato et al, 2020;Armitage et al, 2020).…”
Section: Information Sharing During Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Larson and Kulchitsky (2000) find that information quality is positively and significantly associated with lead time performance, including on-time delivery. It also has a positive and significant relationship with service performance in the context of humanitarian SC (Najjar et al, 2019). Whilst similar results have been indicated in the context of FPSC, further empirical evidence is required to support the claim (Lusiantoro et al, 2018), particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, in which the wide spread of mis-and unverified information emerged, termed as "infodemic" (WHO, 2020; Laato et al, 2020;Armitage et al, 2020).…”
Section: Information Sharing During Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…As such, we believe that the higher the degree of information sharing and information quality, the better the chance of organisations to cognitively assess the usefulness of the information (interpret meanings), before acquiring it to achieve specific purposes (Giannakis, 2008;Gilbert and Cordey-Hayes, 1996). Similarly, higher degree of information sharing and information quality could indicate a strong collaborative relationship (Najjar et al, 2019), which could increase trust (e.g. Erdem and Ozen, 2003) and create better experience for the SC actors involved in the process, leading to better emotional assessment of the shared information.…”
Section: Information Sharing Information Quality and Social Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing research examines the mediating role of information sharing when examining the link between information quality and SC performance (Marinagi et al, 2015;Kankam et al, 2023) and the mediating role of information sharing and information quality on the relationship between driven culture on customer development and firm performance (Agyei-Owusu et al, 2021). In other studies, information quality is treated as an independent variable (Najjar et al, 2019;Omar et al, 2010;Suprapto et al, 2017) with information sharing being dependent on information quality. Najjar et al (2019) argue that focusing on only information sharing isn't enough to achieve good SC performance.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies, information quality is treated as an independent variable (Najjar et al, 2019;Omar et al, 2010;Suprapto et al, 2017) with information sharing being dependent on information quality. Najjar et al (2019) argue that focusing on only information sharing isn't enough to achieve good SC performance. The MSCRA 5,4…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%