2016
DOI: 10.1108/cpoib-09-2013-0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shareholder activism and the ethical harnessing of institutional investors

Abstract: Changes made as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing, formatting and page numbers may not be reflected in this version. For the definitive version of this publication, please refer to the published source. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite this paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Critics have charged that progress has been mixed and that most of the oil and gas majors continue to invest in controversial projects such as arctic drilling and fracking (Ivanova, 2016 ). However, such investments may end up as “stranded assets” as a growing number of investors shun the sector, prompted by ethical or commercial concerns.…”
Section: Illustrations Of Organizations Coping With Long-term Energy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics have charged that progress has been mixed and that most of the oil and gas majors continue to invest in controversial projects such as arctic drilling and fracking (Ivanova, 2016 ). However, such investments may end up as “stranded assets” as a growing number of investors shun the sector, prompted by ethical or commercial concerns.…”
Section: Illustrations Of Organizations Coping With Long-term Energy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the papers in the first category are related to MNE-NGO collaborations (e.g. Herlin & Solitander, 2017;Marano & Tashman, 2012), and NGOs' campaigning strategies (Ivanova, 2016;Reis & Guedes, 2017).…”
Section: Under-represented Topics In Ibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public activism in the form of AGM attendance and filing of shareholder resolutions is one avenue for escalating an engagement. It is much more frequently used in the United States compared to the UK due to a regulatory system which facilitates access to corporate proxy statements (Louche & Lydenberg, ) and to cultural differences between UK and transatlantic investors (Ivanova, ). This failure to go beyond private dialogue could be explained by a lack of experience in other forms of shareholder activism:
To go to an AGM to ask a question you got to know what you do, how you do that, if you are going to table a resolution at an AGM, knowing how to present a resolution ( Fieldwork Interview , asset owner, 2013).
…”
Section: Challenges To the Effective Monitoring Of The Corporation: Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are researchers who argue that investors do not engage with investee companies enough (Black, ), preferring to, in cases when monitoring is costly or time consuming, respond to a poor performance by just selling their shares (Coffee, ; Manconi et al, ). Ivanova () explores some of the reasons why this trend is more pronounced in the UK than in the United States. Davis () and Jackson () observe an ownership paradox related to shareholders, whereby large institutions have traditionally adopted a passive approach and have refrained from challenging management's decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation