2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10606-013-9192-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing Knowledge and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
0
107
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the researcher came to understand an artifact through the study of marine operators' cooperative work at sea. Most importantly, the idea of combining the material and non-material in relation to work practices can tell a story about the relations of artifacts as the non-material component of work practices [65][66][67]. Schmidt and Bansler ([33], p. 24) describe such an idea as follows:…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the researcher came to understand an artifact through the study of marine operators' cooperative work at sea. Most importantly, the idea of combining the material and non-material in relation to work practices can tell a story about the relations of artifacts as the non-material component of work practices [65][66][67]. Schmidt and Bansler ([33], p. 24) describe such an idea as follows:…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, users do not always stop after finding that person, since there is no guarantee that they found an expert. Real-world and hence in many cases not fully automated search for expertise is a multi-step process involving reading several documents and meeting several persons by following all kinds of document and social path-ways (Ackerman et al, 2002). That imaginary, yet sensible and realistic activity, is exactly what we attempted to model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not likely that reading only one document and consulting only one person is enough to completely satisfy a personal information need in the enterprise. The real-world user should realize that the expertise needed is partly contained in several retrieved documents and partly in the personal memory of several experts (Ackerman et al, 2002). Note that while modeling the expertise gathering process, we apply different techniques to concentrate the random walk around the most relevant documents, since we rely on the assumption that all sources of the same knowledge are located close to each other in expertise graphs.…”
Section: Motivating Multi-step Relevance Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations