Sharing of clinical trial data among trialists: a cross sectional survey

Abstract

Objective To investigate clinical trialists' opinions and experiences of sharing of clinical trial data with investigators who are not directly collaborating with the research team. Main outcome measures Support for and prevalence of data sharing through data repositories and in response to individual requests, concerns with data sharing through repositories, and reasons for granting or denying requests. Design and settingResults Of 683 potential respondents, 317 completed the survey (response rate 46%). In principle, 236 (74%) thought that sharing de-identified data through data repositories should be required, and 229 (72%) thought that investigators should be required to share de-identified data in response to individual requests. In practice, only 56 (18%) indicated that they were required by the trial funder to deposit the trial data in a repository; of these 32 (57%) had done so. In all, 149 respondents (47%) had received an individual request to share their clinical trial data; of these, 115 (77%) had granted and 56 (38%) had denied at least one request. Respondents' most common concerns about data sharing were related to appropriate data use, investigator or funder interests, and protection of research subjects. ConclusionsWe found strong support for sharing clinical trial data among corresponding authors of recently published trials in high impact general medical journals who responded to our survey, including a willingness to share data, although several practical concerns were identified.

When Patient Engagement and Research Ethics Collide: Lessons from a Dementia Forum

“…There currently exist many research ethics restrictions on data sharing due to concerns over participant privacy [57,58]. However, we did not include scenarios that include risks such as potential breaches of privacy.…”

Social networks, social media, and social diseases

“…Increased awareness of the disease among the US public during the recent flu season triggered higher than expected web searches and an overshoot in the prediction of the number of likely cases. 39 As calls for data from clinical trials to be made public grow, 40 the online social collaborative model will also change the way researchers engage with each other and with the public. Today researchers gather their data, analyse them, and publish results, but the data remain behind academic or commercial walls.…”

To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research

“…Data sharing could potentially lead to an optimization of time and costs of clinical research by preventing the duplication of trials [70,71]. For example, costs for the stipulation of insurances for patients' coverage, the purchase of materials or the salaries of the staff responsible for data collection can be avoided.…”