1999
DOI: 10.1080/08878739909555208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing the arena: Changing roles and negotiating power among teacher education participants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ATE developed a partnership that brought together university teacher education faculty, school-based supervising teachers, and teacher certification candidates as part of a larger project to "'co-reform'" education at both the K-12 and the university levels (Szuminiski, Zath, & Benton, 1999, p. 296). Szuminiski, Zath, & Benton (1999) explain that the university teacher education faculty, "accustomed to being the most dominant and oftentimes the only voice" (p. 298), broadened their roles in two ways: as colleagues with others in several Revising Roles -6 teacher education departments and by inviting school-based cooperating teachers and certification students into conversations about planning. The school-based cooperating teachers met with the university teacher education faculty and the certification candidates in biweekly planning meetings and eventually felt themselves to be "co-developers" of the certification students' experiences, moving from a relationship that was "impositional" (i.e., here is your student teacher) to one that was "interactional" (Szuminiski, Zath, & Benton, 1999, p. 301).…”
Section: Roles and Realities: Terms Of Discussion And Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ATE developed a partnership that brought together university teacher education faculty, school-based supervising teachers, and teacher certification candidates as part of a larger project to "'co-reform'" education at both the K-12 and the university levels (Szuminiski, Zath, & Benton, 1999, p. 296). Szuminiski, Zath, & Benton (1999) explain that the university teacher education faculty, "accustomed to being the most dominant and oftentimes the only voice" (p. 298), broadened their roles in two ways: as colleagues with others in several Revising Roles -6 teacher education departments and by inviting school-based cooperating teachers and certification students into conversations about planning. The school-based cooperating teachers met with the university teacher education faculty and the certification candidates in biweekly planning meetings and eventually felt themselves to be "co-developers" of the certification students' experiences, moving from a relationship that was "impositional" (i.e., here is your student teacher) to one that was "interactional" (Szuminiski, Zath, & Benton, 1999, p. 301).…”
Section: Roles and Realities: Terms Of Discussion And Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%