Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2001576.2001856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp bounds by probability-generating functions and variable drift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We point out that obtaining such precise results is also a current trend in the analysis of expected optimisation times [12,13].…”
Section: Models and Notationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We point out that obtaining such precise results is also a current trend in the analysis of expected optimisation times [12,13].…”
Section: Models and Notationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Unfortunately, in our case the drift displays an uncommon behavior, being strongest for medium range pheromone values and weaker at the extremes. This makes all of the additive drift method of He and Yao, best for uniform drift, the multiplicative drift method by Doerr, Johannsen and Winzen [6], best for drift proportional to the distance from the optimum, and the variable drift method of Johannsen [23] (cited, e.g., in [5]), applicable whenever the drift is monotone with the distance from the optimum, give only bad run-time bounds. For this reason, we prove a generalization of the variable drift theorem (in a sense, of all drift theorems so far) that does not need the assumption that the drift is non-decreasing with the distance from the goal.…”
Section: Ant Colony Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove lower bounds on the hitting time by variable drift, we need additional assumptions like the one in the following lemma, a special case of which was first proposed in [DFW11].…”
Section: Drift Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%