2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00030-019-0612-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp semi-concavity in a non-autonomous control problem and $$\pmb {L^p}$$ estimates in an optimal-exit MFG

Abstract: This paper studies a mean field game inspired by crowd motion in which agents evolve in a compact domain and want to reach its boundary minimizing the sum of their travel time and a given boundary cost. Interactions between agents occur through their dynamic, which depends on the distribution of all agents.We start by considering the associated optimal control problem, showing that semi-concavity in space of the corresponding value function can be obtained by requiring as time regularity only a lower Lipschitz… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for any s ∈ [1, +∞). As a consequence,ρ satisfies estimate (4.24) and, passing to the limit in (4.19), we get that the measure [26], in order to establish L p -estimates for the time evolving distributions describing equilibria in optimal-exit MFGs. Let us also point out that the absolute continuity of ρ(t), for all t ∈ [0, T ], has already been established in [30,Section 5], under more general assumptions than (A2), but without providing the L p -estimate (4.18).…”
Section: Lemma 41 Under (A2) We Havementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for any s ∈ [1, +∞). As a consequence,ρ satisfies estimate (4.24) and, passing to the limit in (4.19), we get that the measure [26], in order to establish L p -estimates for the time evolving distributions describing equilibria in optimal-exit MFGs. Let us also point out that the absolute continuity of ρ(t), for all t ∈ [0, T ], has already been established in [30,Section 5], under more general assumptions than (A2), but without providing the L p -estimate (4.18).…”
Section: Lemma 41 Under (A2) We Havementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The method of our proof is reminiscent of the techniques employed in nonatomic game theory (see [31,39,40]) and could also be useful in justifying the asymptotic nature of more sophisticated deterministic MFGs (see e.g. [26,37] for minimal-time MFGs and Remark 3.1(ii) for the state constrained MFG considered in [10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we study MFG(K, m 0 ) in a Lagrangian setting, in which the evolution of agents is described by a measure Q ∈ P(C( Ω)) in the space of all continuous trajectories C( Ω). This classical approach in optimal transport has become widely used in the analysis of MFGs with deterministic trajectories in recent years (see, e.g., [13], [15], [21], [25], [26]). Note that the distribution m t of agents at time t ≥ 0 can be retrieved from Q using the evaluation map e t by m t = e t # Q.…”
Section: B Lagrangian Equilibria and Their Existencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same vein, Mazanti and Santambrogio [23] obtain the existence of MFG equilibria for minimal time MFGs; in their problem, each agent aims to exit a given closed subset of a general compact metric space in minimal time with a bounded speed. (For some generalizations in the Euclidean setting, see also [16]). Moreover, in [3], Achdou et al prove the existence of a relaxed equilibrium in the case of deterministic MFG with control on the acceleration with state constraints; in this case, the strong controllability condition does not hold and the Hamiltonian fails to be convex or coercive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%