1989
DOI: 10.1080/07352688909382274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shatter resistance in crop plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the dehiscence of the heads can also be improved through breeding. This has been demonstrated in several other field crops (Kadkol et al, 1989;Morgan et al, 2000). Moreover, source of shattering resistance were identified in V. subsp.…”
Section: Prospects For Genetic Improvement Of Vernoniasupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Similarly, the dehiscence of the heads can also be improved through breeding. This has been demonstrated in several other field crops (Kadkol et al, 1989;Morgan et al, 2000). Moreover, source of shattering resistance were identified in V. subsp.…”
Section: Prospects For Genetic Improvement Of Vernoniasupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The linkage map of B. rapa constructed by Song et al (1991) suggested some structural rearrangements (insertions, deletions and inversions) had occurred after the duplication of chromosomes during its evolution. Shattering is thought to be a wild-type character and resistance to shattering is thought to be an evolutionary consequence of domestication of crop plants and is a result of mutation in shatter-susceptible ancestors (Kadkol et al 1989). Therefore, it is likely that the recessive alleles, sh1 and sh2, may have originated from independent mutations at the two duplicated loci during the evolution of B. rapa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences in measures of shatter tolerance were observed among cultivars of B. napus, B. campestris and B. juncea. However, there was also substantial within plant variation associated with pod size rather than with the position in the inflorescence from which the pod was obtained (Kadkol et al 1985;1989). This indicated that the sampling procedure was crucial to accurate assessments of genotype differences in shatter tolerance, and measurements of few pods from many plants adjusted for pod size was recommended.…”
Section: Adaptation To New Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 96%