2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2005)131:6(878)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear Analysis and Design of Ductile Steel Plate Walls

Abstract: For the past few decades global attention and interest has grown in the application of Ductile Steel Plate Walls (DSPW) for building lateral load resisting systems. Advantages of using DSPWs in a building as lateral force resisting system compromise stable hysteretic characteristics, high plastic energy absorption capacity and enhanced stiffness, strength and ductility. A significant number of experimental and analytical studies have been carried out to establish analysis and design methods for such lateral re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this method is mentioned in seismic provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (AISC 2005) in chapter 17 [13]. The second model is based on the plastic yielding of the plate with surrounding frame (plastic yielding model) presented by Sabouri & Roberts (1991) [10]. In this study the first model is employed to design steel shear walls.…”
Section: Modeling Of Steel Shear Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, this method is mentioned in seismic provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (AISC 2005) in chapter 17 [13]. The second model is based on the plastic yielding of the plate with surrounding frame (plastic yielding model) presented by Sabouri & Roberts (1991) [10]. In this study the first model is employed to design steel shear walls.…”
Section: Modeling Of Steel Shear Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following them, many other scientists, e.g. Bruneau and Bhagwagar [4], Berman and Bruneau [5], Elghali et al [6,7], Astaneh Asl [8,9], and Sabouri Ghomi [10,11] have examined numerous tests on the subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of existing analytic simplified formulations [12,13], the panel dimensions have been determined as b = 600 mm, d = 2400 mm and s = 1.15 mm. In order to guarantee a b/d ratio lower than 0.8, that is indicated as the lower bound of the aspect ratio beyond which the development of a correct plastic mechanism is not developed, the insertion of appropriate transversal rectangular stiffeners (height of 100 mm and thickness of 4 mm) along the whole panel length has been foreseen.…”
Section: The Retrofitting Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1), which would allow using a column depth equal to 1/2 of the actual one, has been determined considering the columns as supported on three points. In such a way the bending moment applied to the vertical elements is equal to 1/4 of the one characterising the scheme without the intermediate member [12], thus determining smaller dimensions of the columns. On the other hand, the beams have to be characterised by an adequate flexural stiffness and strength to allow an uniform tension field in the shear panel surface.…”
Section: System Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They consist of thin at steel plates referred to as in ll panels which are framed by beams and columns [3][4][5][6]. The experimental and analytical studies on the thin SPSWs have been performed under monotonic and cyclic loading [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The surrounding steel frame can be applied with either simple or moment-resisting beam-to-column connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%