1990
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1990)116:12(3380)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear Behavior of Joints in Precast Concrete Segmental Bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
102
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
102
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 show the comparison of the shear capacity obtained from the estimation formula presented in this paper [5] with the formulas proposed by ATEP [1], AASHTO [2], Turmo [3] and Rombach [4], for 1, 3, 5 and 7 keys and depending on the prestressing stress.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 show the comparison of the shear capacity obtained from the estimation formula presented in this paper [5] with the formulas proposed by ATEP [1], AASHTO [2], Turmo [3] and Rombach [4], for 1, 3, 5 and 7 keys and depending on the prestressing stress.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To compare the estimations given by the ATEP formula [1], which are ultimate values, with the nominal values from the AASHTO formula [2], the ATEP estimations must be divided by the strength reduction factor from the AASHTO, whose value is 0.75. Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 show the comparison of the shear capacity obtained from the estimation formula presented in this paper [5] with the formulas proposed by ATEP [1], AASHTO [2], Turmo [3] and Rombach [4], for 1, 3, 5 and 7 keys and depending on the prestressing stress.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations