1997
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(1997)1:1(17)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear Behavior of URM Retrofitted with FRP Overlays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the testing of FRP reinforcement (horizontally and vertically placed uni-directional strips), Triantafillou [3] stressed that achievement of the full in-plane strength depends on proper anchorage. Similarly Ehsani [4] reported that the detachment of FRP from the masonry surface is critical. On the contrary, Borri [5] achieved an increase in strength for strengthened panels, without any detachment at diagonal compressive tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…With regard to the testing of FRP reinforcement (horizontally and vertically placed uni-directional strips), Triantafillou [3] stressed that achievement of the full in-plane strength depends on proper anchorage. Similarly Ehsani [4] reported that the detachment of FRP from the masonry surface is critical. On the contrary, Borri [5] achieved an increase in strength for strengthened panels, without any detachment at diagonal compressive tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Various conventional methods have been used for strengthening masonry walls such as the construction of single or double jackets made of steel-reinforced shotcrete or cast-insitu concrete and grout injections (Ehsani et al 1997;Triantafillou 1998). These methods may be problematic due to the extra weight added to the building that increases the threat of failure under cyclic loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods may be problematic due to the extra weight added to the building that increases the threat of failure under cyclic loading. Such reinforcement has drawbacks, including the eventual deterioration of steel reinforcement due to corrosion, the need for large site work and scaffolding, and the effect on the appearance of the building which does not preserve the architectural value of the historical buildings (Ehsani et al 1997;Triantafillou 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the strength, stiffness and ductility of masonry buildings have reportedly been improved [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. On the other hand, methods forming the second group involve the strengthening of brick surfaces using materials such as FRP, wires, fibre materials, steel mesh, steel and wood sheets, and used tires [17][18][19][20][21][22]. A comprehensive review of such materials is given in the paper proposed by Lizundia et al [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%