Shear wave velocity, seismic attenuation, and thermal structure of the continental upper mantle

Abstract

S U M M A R YSeismic velocity and attenuation anomalies in the mantle are commonly interpreted in terms of temperature variations on the basis of laboratory studies of elastic and anelastic properties of rocks. In order to evaluate the relative contributions of thermal and non-thermal effects on anomalies of attenuation of seismic shear waves, Q −1 s , and seismic velocity, V s , we compare global maps of the thermal structure of the continental upper mantle with global Q −1 s and V s maps as determined from Rayleigh waves at periods between 40 and 150 s. We limit the comparison to three continental mantle depths (50, 100 and 150 km), where model resolution is relatively high.The available data set does not indicate that, at a global scale, seismic anomalies in the upper mantle are controlled solely by temperature variations. Continental maps have correlation coefficients of <0.56 between V s and T and of <0.47 between Q s and T at any depth. Such low correlation coefficients can partially be attributed to modelling artefacts; however, they also suggest that not all of the V s and Q s anomalies in the continental upper mantle can be explained by T variations.Global maps show that, by the sign of the anomaly, V s and Q s usually inversely correlate with lithospheric temperatures: most cratonic regions show high V s and Q s and low T, while most active regions have seismic and thermal anomalies of the opposite sign. The strongest inverse correlation is found at a depth of 100 km, where the attenuation model is best resolved. Significantly, at this depth, the contours of near-zero Q s anomalies approximately correspond to the 1000 • C isotherm, in agreement with laboratory measurements that show a pronounced increase in seismic attenuation in upper mantle rocks at 1000-1100 • C. East-west profiles of V s , Q s and T where continental data coverage is best (50 • N latitude for North America and 60 • N latitude for Eurasia) further demonstrate that temperature plays a dominant, but non-unique, role in determining the value of lithospheric V s and Q s .At 100 km depth, where the resolution of seismic models is the highest, we compare observed seismic V s and Q s with theoretical V T s and Q T s values, respectively, that are calculated solely from temperature anomalies and constrained by experimental data on temperature dependencies of velocity and attenuation. This comparison shows that temperature variations alone are sufficient to explain seismic V s and Q s in ca 50 per cent of continental regions. We hypothesize that compositional anomalies resulting from Fe depletion can explain the misfit between seismic and theoretical V s in cratonic lithosphere. In regions of active tectonics, temperature effects alone cannot explain seismic V s and Q s in the lithosphere. It is likely that partial melts and/or fluids may affect seismic parameters in these regions. This study demonstrates that lithospheric temperature plays the dominant role in controlling V s and Q s anomalies, but other physical parameters, such as composit...

Rayleigh wave constraints on the structure and tectonic history of the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains, East Antarctica

“…We compare our results at periods from 50 to 175 s to emphasize similarities in the upper mantle structure and exclude shorter‐period phase velocities that are highly sensitive to crustal thickness and structure that vary between different regions. Our phase velocities at these periods correlate best with regions having a tectonothermal age of Paleoproterozoic‐Mesoproterozoic (2500–1700 Ma), with slightly poorer fits for regions of Archean (>2500 Ma) and a classification known as “undifferentiated” Precambrian (Figure ), a classification that encompasses regions of Proterozoic aged crust that have significant Phanerozoic sedimentary cover [ Artemieva et al ., ; Mooney et al ., ; Poupinet and Shapiro , ]. The age determined from this analysis is consistent with recent tectonic reconstructions of the region [ Boger , ; Veevers and Saeed , ].…”

Low-Yield Nuclear Testing by North Korea in May 2010: Assessing the Evidence with Atmospheric Transport Models and Xenon Activity Calculations

“…94 Whilst the relationship between T, V, and Q is not always perfect, Artemieva et al find that they do correlate in the Sino-Korean craton, terming it an unexpectedly "hot region." 95 Perhaps in some support of this line of reasoning, Kvaerna et al find the site-specific threshold monitoring capability for the IMS to be between 2.3 and 2.5, improved to 2.1-2.3 and perhaps down to 2.0 with the addition of station MDJ. 96 This is defined as an estimate, at the 90 percent probability level, of the largest hypothetical seismic event at a given site or in a given region that could possibly have occurred.…”

Multiple-frequencySH-wave tomography of the western US upper mantle

“…We plot a comparison of δlnV S and δlnQ S at evenly spaced points in the western US mantle (0-800 km depth) in Fig. Romanowicz 1990;Artemieva et al 2004;Dalton & Ekström 2006). The point spacing is 60 km, about the minimum spacing of the tetrahedral grid, and thus the following analysis is in 'broadband', that is, containing information of both short and long wave lengths.…”