2020
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2019.2936046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shift-Invariant Canonical Polyadic Decomposition of Complex-Valued Multi-Subject fMRI Data With a Phase Sparsity Constraint

Abstract: This is a self-archived version of an original article. This version may differ from the original in pagination and typographic details.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, existing TKD algorithms for fMRI analyses mostly utilize orthogonality constraints to extract FC patterns across time and subjects. These algorithms, however, are unsuitable for extracting common spatial and temporal patterns across subjects due to distinct characteristics such as high-level noise [26]. Motivated by the success of TKD-based image denoising algorithms such as RKCA, we propose to enforce fMRI-specific constraints on Tucker-2 model to analyze three-way multi-subject fMRI data (voxel × time × subject).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, existing TKD algorithms for fMRI analyses mostly utilize orthogonality constraints to extract FC patterns across time and subjects. These algorithms, however, are unsuitable for extracting common spatial and temporal patterns across subjects due to distinct characteristics such as high-level noise [26]. Motivated by the success of TKD-based image denoising algorithms such as RKCA, we propose to enforce fMRI-specific constraints on Tucker-2 model to analyze three-way multi-subject fMRI data (voxel × time × subject).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qiu et al utilized SSP to identify more significant variance changes and higher sensitivity to the spatial differences between HCs and SZs, compared to the magnitude of spatial activations [6]. Kuang et al proposed to impose an SSP sparsity constraint on the complex-valued shared spatial maps to improve separation performance of tensor decomposition [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-subject fMRI data can provide shared and/or individual spatial and temporal components for understanding brain functions and mental disorders via blind source separation (BSS) [1]- [6]. Among others, group independent component analysis (GICA) performs ICA on concatenated singlesubject fMRI data along space or time to obtain either shared time courses (TCs) and individual spatial maps (SMs) or shared SMs and individual TCs [1] [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent vector analysis (IVA) carries out joint ICA of single-subject fMRI data to obtain individual SMs and TCs from a group-level viewpoint [3][4]. Compared with GICA and IVA, tensor decomposition makes full use of structural information of multi-subject fMRI data to provide shared SMs and TCs [5] [6]. Canonical polyadic decomposition (CPD) and Tucker decomposition (TKD) and are two commonly utilized tensor decomposition algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%