1980
DOI: 10.1016/0309-1708(80)90028-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting level modelling of hydrologic series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
198
0
22

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
198
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The lag-k serial correlation coefficient (r k ) of the detrended series Y t was computed according to Salas et al [75]:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lag-k serial correlation coefficient (r k ) of the detrended series Y t was computed according to Salas et al [75]:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the set of alternative modeling approaches (autoregressive models, neural networks, extremely randomize trees, etc. ), linear periodic PAR(1) models [Salas et al, 1980] were identified because they are able to provide good forecasts of the inflow processes according to the adopted monthly time step, see the explained variance in Table 2. In particular, the interannual variability characterizing the inflows in the Zambezi system [Rocha and Simmonds, 1997;Mazvimavi and Wolski, 2006] has limited impacts on the considered objectives and it can be captured by autoregressive models.…”
Section: Zambezi River Agent-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, a historical flood record will be constructed for the downstream city of Carlisle to put the shorter record into a longer timescale context. several reasons including where recording equipment failed to record a river stage, the effects of extreme river flows and the loss of data due to downloading or computer storage problems (Salas, 1993). The approach used for record augmentation (Matalas and Jacobs, 1964) in this research is outlined below and is based on the techniques recommended by the Flood Estimation Handbook (FSR, 1975;FEH, 1999).…”
Section: Data Pre-treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%