2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-016-3980-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting paradigms for Nepal’s protected areas: history, challenges and relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The protected areas of Nepal are largely successful in conserving and increasing populations of threatened wildlife such as greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis Linnaeus, 1758) and royal Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris Linnaeus, 1758) (MFSC 2014, DNPWC & DFSC 2018. However, these PAs also face a number of management challenges, and one of these is an increasing number and abundance of IAPS (MFSC 2014, Bhattarai et al 2017. The problem of plant invasions is particularly serious in the PAs located in the southern lowland of the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protected areas of Nepal are largely successful in conserving and increasing populations of threatened wildlife such as greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis Linnaeus, 1758) and royal Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris Linnaeus, 1758) (MFSC 2014, DNPWC & DFSC 2018. However, these PAs also face a number of management challenges, and one of these is an increasing number and abundance of IAPS (MFSC 2014, Bhattarai et al 2017. The problem of plant invasions is particularly serious in the PAs located in the southern lowland of the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nepal has protected a large percentage of its land (>23 per cent), putting it in the top-20 countries globally and second in Asia for the percentage of its surface area that is protected (Chaudhary et al, 2009). It also has one of the more progressive systems of protected areas and community forestry in the world (Allendorf & Gurung, 2016;Bhattarai et al, 2017;Bhusal, 2014;Heinen & Shrestha, 2006;Ryan, 2015). While Myanmar has maintained large tracts of its natural habitats (Bhagwat et al, 2017), only 6 per cent is within protected areas (Aung, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside this, buff er zones of thirteen protected areas, ten Ramsar sites (Wetlands of International Importance) and protection forests, some of which overlap with the protected areas, all are considered as the protected sites which off er potentiality for ecotourism development. As Nepal in the frontline in community-based conservation strategies, conservation area and buff er zone programme of National parks and wildlife reserves are of great signifi cance (Bhattarai et al, 2017). A country where nearly a quarter of total area is allocated for conservation and with some potential negative impact of those protected areas in livelihood involvement of local people in several tourism activities which could be the potential way-out for the conservation of the natural areas, increasing revenue through people's participation in tourism and sustainable management of resources (Bajracharya & Lama, 2008).…”
Section: Protected Area Based Tourismmentioning
confidence: 99%