2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifts from native to non-indigenous mussels: Enhanced habitat complexity and its effects on faunal assemblages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck 1819 is a widespread filterfeeding bivalve along the Atlantic rocky shores of the Iberian Peninsula, with a relevant role in intertidal food webs [16]. It is considered an ecosystem engineer species because it maintains useful habitat for other organisms, enhancing the biodiversity [17,18]. This species has long been harvested for food and bait and is now severely exploited in many European countries as Italy, Spain and Portugal [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck 1819 is a widespread filterfeeding bivalve along the Atlantic rocky shores of the Iberian Peninsula, with a relevant role in intertidal food webs [16]. It is considered an ecosystem engineer species because it maintains useful habitat for other organisms, enhancing the biodiversity [17,18]. This species has long been harvested for food and bait and is now severely exploited in many European countries as Italy, Spain and Portugal [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also spread to the inner part of the Galician Rias Baixas (NW Spain) [ 34 ], where it co-occurs with the commercially-important mussel M . galloprovincialis , forming monospecific and mixed patchy aggregations of differing densities on diverse substrates [ 35 ]. In this environment, facilitative rather than competitive interactions between juveniles of the two species occur, although the interactions vary depending on the environmental context [ 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that structural differences between mussel bed edges and interiors are not large enough to be relevant to invertebrates (cf. previous studies comparing morphologically different mussel species or those where mussel size and clumping were manipulated to produce sharp differences in mussel bed structure; e.g., Palomo et al 2007;Gestoso et al 2013). Similarly, although sediment availability was higher in the interior of mussel beds, there were no differences in the density of sedimentdependent species, such as the polychaete Boccardia polybranchia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%