Arctic Shipping 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9781351037464-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shipping in the Canadian and Russian Arctic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these strategic and planning documents of the country, especially the Arctic policy documents of 2020 and 2035 have provided a legal and ethical basis for the long-term security planning and development in the Russian Arctic Zone. Many security experts and researchers have examined the Russian strategic documents on Arctic policy and have identified changes and future impacts (Bartenstein & Lalonde, 2019; Gjedssø & Gallucci, 2016; Hoffecker, 2010; Lukin, 2016). However, it is the adoption of the Basic Principles-2035, as well as the transformation of government structures (formation of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for the Development of the Far East and the Arctic, State Commission on the Arctic Development), that has led to the restructuring of the country’s Arctic policy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these strategic and planning documents of the country, especially the Arctic policy documents of 2020 and 2035 have provided a legal and ethical basis for the long-term security planning and development in the Russian Arctic Zone. Many security experts and researchers have examined the Russian strategic documents on Arctic policy and have identified changes and future impacts (Bartenstein & Lalonde, 2019; Gjedssø & Gallucci, 2016; Hoffecker, 2010; Lukin, 2016). However, it is the adoption of the Basic Principles-2035, as well as the transformation of government structures (formation of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for the Development of the Far East and the Arctic, State Commission on the Arctic Development), that has led to the restructuring of the country’s Arctic policy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China's strategic and technological frontiers slightly differ from the four global commons generally identified by international law: the high seas, the atmosphere, Antarctica and outer space (Buck, 1998). These spaces are also often considered to be the ‘common heritage of mankind’ (Nicholson, 2002)—a term which Chinese scholars readily adopt, as it fits neatly with the discourses of ‘commonality’ that Chinese officials apply to the Arctic (Bartenstein, 2015). China's Arctic Policy asserts that the region's development can benefit ‘a community with shared future for mankind’.…”
Section: Policy Origins Of China's Volumetric Vision Of the Arcticmentioning
confidence: 99%