2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shoal sex composition and predation risk influence sub-adult threespine stickleback shoaling decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have quantified the tendency of a focal three-spined stickleback to approach and stay close to a group of conspecifics placed behind a transparent barrier in different contexts [3032]. However, to our knowledge there are no studies measuring shoaling in free swimming sticklebacks by calculating the distances between the members of the group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have quantified the tendency of a focal three-spined stickleback to approach and stay close to a group of conspecifics placed behind a transparent barrier in different contexts [3032]. However, to our knowledge there are no studies measuring shoaling in free swimming sticklebacks by calculating the distances between the members of the group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aggregation provides benefits for their members such as reduced predation risk and increased foraging efficiency and mating opportunities [55]. In three-spined sticklebacks this behaviour is typically measured in tanks with three compartments separated by transparent walls, where a focal fish in the centre shows preference to swim close to conspecifics located in one of the lateral compartments [3032,56,57]. The same type of attraction is elicited if the conspecifics are confined in a glass flask placed in the tank with the focal fish [52,58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, this study found significant effects of the sexual composition on swimming activity in a baseline shoaling context as well as regarding shock reaction. Sexual differences in activity and other aspects of shoaling behaviour are understudied (but see Richards et al ., 2010; Rystrom et al ., 2018), although they may ultimately affect individuals' fitness, e.g ., in terms of foraging or mating, and may be related to sex‐biased dispersal. Further research should address the causes and consequences of sex‐biased activity levels in fishes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas most studies investigate sex effects concerning shoal choice by individuals, few studies consider shoal members' behaviour, i.e ., actual shoaling performance. Yet female guppies, Poecilia reticulata , were shown to spend more time shoaling and to swim more cohesively than male conspecifics (Richards et al ., 2010), whereas non‐reproductive male three‐spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus , shoal more actively than females (Rystrom et al ., 2018). Sex‐specific energy requirements (Blumer, 1986) may have implications for shoaling variables in species that forage in shoals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different preferences may be expressed according to context. In sub-adult threespine sticklebacks, fish preferred to associate with the opposite sex under low predation threat, but changed the preference in favor of same sex fish when predation risk was greater (Rystrom et al, 2018). The shoaling preferences of individuals is also mediated by the sex of the choosing fish.…”
Section: Sexmentioning
confidence: 98%