2001
DOI: 10.1071/as01047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock Drift Acceleration of Electrons

Abstract: We review the theory of shock drift acceleration, developing the theory in detail for gyrophaseaveraged particles. It is shown howboth the upstream and downstream velocity spaces separate into different regions according to the interaction of the particles with the shock (reflection, transmission, head-on, overtaking). The effects of the cross-shock electric field and of the magnetic overshoot are discussed. The effectiveness of acceleration is estimated for Maxwellian and power law distributions. The conditio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
111
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. As pointed out in previous studies, particles cannot be reflected by the shock when θ Bn is near 90°(e.g., Holman & Pesses 1983;Ball & Melrose 2001). Now we examine the positions of energetic electrons as the shock reaches different heights.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5. As pointed out in previous studies, particles cannot be reflected by the shock when θ Bn is near 90°(e.g., Holman & Pesses 1983;Ball & Melrose 2001). Now we examine the positions of energetic electrons as the shock reaches different heights.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At quasiperpendicular shocks, electrons can be accelerated by gradient drift in the magnetic field at the shock along the motional electric field, known as shock drift acceleration (SDA, Armstrong et al 1985) or fast Fermi acceleration (Wu 1984). However, for a single reflection at a planar shock in the scatterfree limit, the energy gain has been shown to be very limited (e.g., Ball & Melrose 2001). Thus, multiple reflections at the shock are required for efficient acceleration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note, though, that our strictly perpendicular shocks are superluminal, and hence a de-Hoffman-Teller frame does not exist, and injection into SDA should be suppressed (Ball & Melrose 2001).…”
Section: Structure Of the Forward Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the approach by Ball & Melrose (2001) and Mann & Klassen (2005), the shock drift acceleration is treated in the de Hoffmann-Teller frame, which is defined by removing the motional electric field. Note that the shock is also at rest in this frame.…”
Section: G Mannmentioning
confidence: 99%