1973
DOI: 10.1214/aop/1176996891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock Models and Wear Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
260
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 587 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
260
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• In 1), ii) and iii), we assume that In each case we get the same result as in [3] and we also show that the assumptions on the quantity , n~O…”
Section: ~~'supporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…• In 1), ii) and iii), we assume that In each case we get the same result as in [3] and we also show that the assumptions on the quantity , n~O…”
Section: ~~'supporting
confidence: 55%
“…The general setup of thi s paper largely follows that of (1] and [ 3]. In [3] , the shock renewa l process was taken to be Poisson , that is , F was assumed to be exponential~ and in [1] , the shock process was assumed to be non-homogeneous Poisson .…”
Section: ~~'mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consider the unit which fails because of damage due to shocks [4,8]: Shocks occur in a renewal process with mean interval (1/0). The probabilities that the unit fails at shock j is p } (/ = 1,2, .…”
Section: Model 4: Replacement After N Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%