2017
DOI: 10.2514/1.j055253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock-Tube Boundary-Layer Effects on Reflected-Shock Conditions with and Without CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 Previous investigations have highlighted the importance of reporting nonidealities present in unmodified shock tubes as they can significantly affect pressure and temper-ature conditions, which in turn significantly affect ignition and kinetics measurements. [51][52][53][54] Chief among these is the change in pressure with time, dP*/dt (where dP* denotes the change in pressure normalized to the test pressure P 5 , ie, dP/P 5 ), of which less than 2%/ms was seen for all experiments, and this change in pressure is negligible in the short domain where the reaction rate is measured for this study (<50 μs). It should also be noted that a slightly different behavior is observed at these test conditions (∼1.4 atm) in terms of dP*/dt, and for the first 100 μs the pressure is relatively unchanged due to a relatively long laminar boundary layer, making these conditions particularly ideal for these experiments.…”
Section: Shock Tubementioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Previous investigations have highlighted the importance of reporting nonidealities present in unmodified shock tubes as they can significantly affect pressure and temper-ature conditions, which in turn significantly affect ignition and kinetics measurements. [51][52][53][54] Chief among these is the change in pressure with time, dP*/dt (where dP* denotes the change in pressure normalized to the test pressure P 5 , ie, dP/P 5 ), of which less than 2%/ms was seen for all experiments, and this change in pressure is negligible in the short domain where the reaction rate is measured for this study (<50 μs). It should also be noted that a slightly different behavior is observed at these test conditions (∼1.4 atm) in terms of dP*/dt, and for the first 100 μs the pressure is relatively unchanged due to a relatively long laminar boundary layer, making these conditions particularly ideal for these experiments.…”
Section: Shock Tubementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 50% CO2 diluted mixtures, dP5/dt was found to be between 2.4 -32.5%/ms, and for the 50% N2 mixtures 11.2 -49.2%/ms, resulting in over 16 K and 34 K temperature increases, respectively. Again, the interpretation of this is clouded with the coupled effects; nevertheless, we could determine dP5/dt was not directly correlated with temperature and mixtures with N2 had larger dP5/dt, similarly discussed in Hargis and Petersen [45]. Further investigation for 50% dilution at these conditions should be properly carried out with use of nonreactive mixtures, whereby the associated effects of bifurcation on pressure and temperature rise can be characterized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…From this pressure rise, a temperature rise can be modeled assuming an isentropic process [44]. The pressure rise as discussed previously [45], can be an order of magnitude higher in mixtures with CO2 when compared to mixtures of Ar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-ideal effects resulting in attenuation of the incident shock wave of shock tubes are of significant interest in particular for chemical kinetic studies [44,45]. These non-ideal effects mainly depend on the boundary layer, experimental conditions, and the shock tube geometry, particularly the inner diameter of the tube [46][47][48]. To estimate the shock attenuation for the divider, the recently determined empirical relations given in [47] are used.…”
Section: Divider Flow Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%