1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.81.5434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock Wave Emissions of a Sonoluminescing Bubble

Abstract: A single bubble in water is excited by a standing ultrasound wave. At high intensity the bubble starts to emit light. Together with the emitted light pulse, a shock wave is generated in the liquid at collapse time. The time-dependent velocity of the outward-travelling shock is measured with an imaging technique. The pressure in the shock and in the bubble is shown to have a lower limit of 5500 bars. Visualization of the shock and the bubble at different phases of the acoustic cycle reveals previously unobserve… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
76
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(24 reference statements)
9
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…that the shock velocity in the immediate vicinity of the bubble is as fast as 4000 m/s, much faster than the speed of sound cϭ1430 m/s in water under normal conditions, but in good agreement with the results of Holzfuss, Rü ggeberg, and Billo (1998). This high shock speed originates from the strong compression of the fluid around the bubble at collapse.…”
Section: F Sound Emission From the Bubblesupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…that the shock velocity in the immediate vicinity of the bubble is as fast as 4000 m/s, much faster than the speed of sound cϭ1430 m/s in water under normal conditions, but in good agreement with the results of Holzfuss, Rü ggeberg, and Billo (1998). This high shock speed originates from the strong compression of the fluid around the bubble at collapse.…”
Section: F Sound Emission From the Bubblesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This has been detected by Cordry (1995), Holzfuss, Rü ggeberg, and Billo (1998), , Wang et al (1999), Gompf and Pecha (2000), Pecha and Gompf (2000), and Weninger et al (2000). used a piezoelectric hydrophone to measure a pressure pulse with fast rise time (5.2 ns) and high amplitude (1.7 bars) at a transducer at 1-mm distance from the bubble.…”
Section: F Sound Emission From the Bubblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the late stages of the collapse the interface velocity can be even higher than the speed of sound in the liquid which results in an outgoing shock wave in the water [30][31][32]. The main collapse is followed by a sequence of afterbounces with decreasing amplitude, after which the whole process repeats itself in the next acoustic cycle.…”
Section: Stability and Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the area affected by the shock wave is clearly reflected by the radius of mist layer which is~1/3 larger than original bubble radius (radius of the bright area). By applying the simulated pressure amplitude, that is, 0.5 MPa at the bubble position, into Gilmore model, the corresponding abrupt changes of the bubble radius and velocity at the bubble wall are 3046 bar* [15] Empirical constant (n) 7.025* [15] *Due to lack of data, the speeds of sound in pure Bi and Sn were assumed for Bi-8 wt pct Zn and Sn-13 wt pct Bi, respectively. The values of empirical constants, B and n, for water were used.…”
Section: Applying Ultrasonic Waves Inside Liquid Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%