1968
DOI: 10.1029/jb073i010p03121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock wave from a lightning discharge

Abstract: A theoretical model of the shock wave from a lightning discharge ranging from the strong blast wave region out to the acoustic limit is given for the first time. The trajectory and overpressure of the strong shock wave are described by the well‐known equations for cylindrical blast waves. In the intermediate shock strength region (1.1 < M < 3.3), the shock trajectory is given by the ‘correct limit’ equation of Vlases and Jones. We derive an additional ‘correct limit’ equation for overpressure that is valid out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure model predicts a maximum pressure of ∼7 GPa, smaller than the pressure thought to be required to generate shocked quartz, ∼10 GPa. One possible reason for this discrepancy is that the energy density of the lightning channel is higher (>10 MJ/m) than the assumed value of 3.3 MJ/m suggested by Jones et al []. There exists a large variation in estimates of the energy density of lightning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pressure model predicts a maximum pressure of ∼7 GPa, smaller than the pressure thought to be required to generate shocked quartz, ∼10 GPa. One possible reason for this discrepancy is that the energy density of the lightning channel is higher (>10 MJ/m) than the assumed value of 3.3 MJ/m suggested by Jones et al []. There exists a large variation in estimates of the energy density of lightning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical evaluations show that the shock radius is R=()4EBρ01/4t1/2 where the constant B ≈3.94. The pressure behind the shock front is p1=2EBR2(γ+1)=0.212ER2. If we take the energy density E = 3.3 MJ/m [ Jones et al , ], and if R ∼ a = 1cm is the radius of the lightning channel, then the shock pressure is p12EBa2(γ+1)=7.0normalGPa which is smaller than the pressure range (≥10 GPa) required to generate shock lamellae in quartz [ Grieve et al , ]. However, if the energy density E is higher, for example, 10 MJ/m, the lower bound suggested by Collins et al [], then p 1 =0.212 E R −2 is large enough to generate a shock pressure of 21 GPa at the boundary of the lightning channel, sufficient to generate shocked quartz, and similar to pressures induced by meteorite impacts.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the shock front has expanded to R c , the cylindrical wave development can be replaced by spherical spreading [ Few , ]. The N wave amplitude is obtained by extrapolating the shock pressure to the characteristic radius R c by fitting the overpressure with the empirical equation [ Jones et al , ] normalΔpp0=γ02(γ0+1)1A[](1+Bη2)3/81where η = r / R c , A = (3/8) 3/5 C 8/5 and B = (8/3) 8/5 C −8/5 , with C ≈0.7[ Plooster , ].…”
Section: Generation Of the Initial Strong Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong shocks are obtained by solving equation numerically with boundary conditions given by . The shock‐to‐acoustic transition is calculated approximately by fitting the shock evolution with Jones' empirical equation [ Jones et al , ]. The N wave amplitude is approximated by extrapolating Jones' curve to r = R c .…”
Section: Generation Of the Initial Strong Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of cylindrical shock waves is usually applied to the study of lightning discharges, 18 resulting in the simplest model of the phenomenon. Theoretical development on this subject started with the similarity solution of spherical shock waves introduced by Sedov 19,20 and Taylor, 21 in relation to the study of atomic explosions.…”
Section: Appendix A: Cylindrical Shock Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%