2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shocks in nova outflows – I. Thermal emission

Abstract: Growing evidence for shocks in nova outflows include (1) multiple velocity components in the optical spectra; (2) hard X-ray emission starting weeks to months after the outburst;(3) an early radio flare on timescales of months, in excess of that predicted from the freely expanding photo-ionized gas; and, perhaps most dramatically, (4) ∼ GeV gamma-ray emission. We present a one dimensional model for the shock interaction between the fast nova outflow and a dense external shell (DES) and its associated thermal X… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
185
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
11
185
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiative shocks can also explain the observed gamma-ray luminosity and nondetection in X-rays (Section 5; Metzger et al 2014). When compared to other gamma-ray-detected novae in the AAVSO database (Kafka 2016), V1324Sco had an unusually dramatic dust event.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Uvoir Light Curvementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Radiative shocks can also explain the observed gamma-ray luminosity and nondetection in X-rays (Section 5; Metzger et al 2014). When compared to other gamma-ray-detected novae in the AAVSO database (Kafka 2016), V1324Sco had an unusually dramatic dust event.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Uvoir Light Curvementioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, for high luminosity TDEs, the intense radiation field may completely ionize helium to He III, allowing only a small fraction of the source luminosity to be absorbed. Such an ionization effect has been explored in Metzger et al (2014) and Metzger & Stone (2015). Determining the ionization state is therefore crucial for estimating the reprocessing efficiency of a TDE envelope.…”
Section: Envelope Ionization Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). The FS propagates at a velocity v fs = v c − v ej v ej , while the velocity of the reverse shock is v rs = v f − v c , where v c is the velocity of the cold central shell, which only moderately exceeds the velocity of the slow ejecta due to the large inertia of the latter (see Metzger et al 2014). Hereafter, the velocities of both shocks are parametrized as v sh = 10 8 v 8 cm s −1 = ηv ej , where η < 1 for the FS and η ∼ 1 for RS.…”
Section: Shock Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X Z is the mass fraction of element Z and mass number A and we have taken a characteristic cross section σ Z thr /2 as half that of the threshold value (see Appendix A of Metzger et al 2014 for justification). For ∆ Z R ej we thus have (in the λ Z 1 limit)…”
Section: Ionized Layermentioning
confidence: 99%