2021
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.01826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shockwave Therapy Plus Eccentric Exercises Versus Isolated Eccentric Exercises for Achilles Insertional Tendinopathy

Abstract: Background:There remains a lack of consensus regarding the treatment of Achilles insertional tendinopathy. The condition is typically treated with eccentric exercises despite the absence of satisfactory and sustained results. Shockwave therapy was presented as an alternative, but there is a paucity of literature, with good outcomes, supporting its use. The purpose of the present single-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was to determine if the use of shockwave therapy in combination w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified 14 studies for full-text review. Among these was one trial protocol [ 33 ] that we later included because it was published [ 34 ] before submitting this systematic review. Following full-text screening, seven studies were excluded for not meeting our eligibility criteria: In four studies, ESWT was investigated in a mixed cohort from which subgroup analysis for mid-AT and ins-AT separately was not possible [ 20 , 35 – 37 ], one study did not meet the required symptom duration prior to inclusion [ 38 ], one study was not a (randomized) controlled clinical trial [ 39 ], and one study was excluded due to use of local anesthesia in the experimental group [ 40 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We identified 14 studies for full-text review. Among these was one trial protocol [ 33 ] that we later included because it was published [ 34 ] before submitting this systematic review. Following full-text screening, seven studies were excluded for not meeting our eligibility criteria: In four studies, ESWT was investigated in a mixed cohort from which subgroup analysis for mid-AT and ins-AT separately was not possible [ 20 , 35 – 37 ], one study did not meet the required symptom duration prior to inclusion [ 38 ], one study was not a (randomized) controlled clinical trial [ 39 ], and one study was excluded due to use of local anesthesia in the experimental group [ 40 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were recruited from an orthopedic hospital unit Inclusion criteria 18–80 years ins-AT symptoms ≥ 6 months functional VAS score > 4 Exclusion criteria (imaging) signs of mid-AT, partial rupture, calcaneal spurs or calcifications contraindications to laser therapy or ESWT (neoplasia, current or previous infections of the affected area, history of epilepsy, coagulopathies, cardiac pacemaker, pregnancy, intolerance to cold) previous Achilles tendon surgery peritendinous injection within the previous 4 weeks ESWT or laser therapy within the previous 2 months congenital or acquired deformities of the lower limb F-ESWT + eccentric loading + stretching (n = 30) F-ESWT consisted of 1600 pulses, EFD 0.05–0.07 mJ/mm 2 , 3 sessions, at 3–4 day intervals Eccentric loading consisted of 3 sets of 10 repetitions using a TheraBand (i.e., a thin ribbon of stretchy material that enables resistance during movement exercises), 2–3 weekly sessions for 2 months Calf and Achilles stretching consisted of 4 sets of 15–20 s, 2–3 weekly sessions for 2 months Cold air and high-energy laser therapy (CHELT) + eccentric loading + stretching (n = 30) CHELT consisted of simultaneous wavelengths (1,064, 810 and 980 nm; total dosage 1,200 J) together with a flow of cold air (− 30 °C), 10 daily sessions Eccentric loading consisted of 3 sets of 10 repetitions using a TheraBand, 2–3 weekly sessions for 2 months Calf and Achilles stretching consisted of 4 sets of 15–20 s, 2–3 weekly sessions for 2 months 10–15 days (end of complete session of treatment), 2 months, and 6 months VAS (range 0–10, mean ± SD) ESWT + standard care Baseline: 7 ± 1.2 10th-15th days: 4.9 ± 0.9 2 months: 5.4 ± 2.7 6 months: 3.3 ± 2.4 CHELT + standard care Baseline: 7 ± 1.0 10th–15th days: 2.3 ± 1.1 2 months: 2.4 ± 1.6 6 months: 1.7 ± 1.0 Results No baseline differences between groups Both groups improved over time CHELT achieved better than ESWT Conclusion CHELT gave quicker and better pain relief. It also gave the patient a full functional recovery and greater satisfaction Not reported Mansur et al [ 34 ] Population and setting Tertiary teaching hospital in São Paulo, Brazil Inclusion criteria 18–75 years pain at the calcaneal tendon insertion for ≥ 3 months diagnosis of ins-AT Exclusion criteria bilateral tendinopathy previous surgery autoimmune conditions neuropathy inflammatory diseases non-insertional or mixed tendinopathy previous infiltration pregnancy use of a pacemaker coagulopathies local infection R-ESWT + ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A total of 194 studies were included (Table 3), of which 109 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 32 were cohort studies, 15 were case series, 26 were case reports, with 12 being other designs, quasiexperimental (4), before-after design (2), case-control (4), and observational (2). e publication year ranged from 1989 to 2021, with 42 of the included studies being published since the year 2020, and 62 since 2019. e tendinopathy most frequently treated was Achilles (99), followed by patellar (58), plantar heel pain (16), gluteal (8), posterior tibial (6), hamstring (5), peroneal (1), extensor hallucis longus (1), and iliopsoas (1). e sample sizes of included studies ranged from 1 to 204 patients.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%