2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- and long-term biomechanical and morphological study of new suture types in abdominal wall closure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Oni et al did not demonstrate a difference in tensile strength six weeks after fascial closure with bidirectional polydioxanone barbed suture and monofilament polydioxanone suture in a porcine model . Similarly, Simon‐Allue et al did not demonstrate a difference in stiffness or tensile load at failure in rabbit linea alba closed with monofilament polydioxanone and barbed polydioxanone . We did not demonstrate a difference in stiffness for the different sutures although the load at failure was significantly greater for polydioxanone than barbed GTC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Oni et al did not demonstrate a difference in tensile strength six weeks after fascial closure with bidirectional polydioxanone barbed suture and monofilament polydioxanone suture in a porcine model . Similarly, Simon‐Allue et al did not demonstrate a difference in stiffness or tensile load at failure in rabbit linea alba closed with monofilament polydioxanone and barbed polydioxanone . We did not demonstrate a difference in stiffness for the different sutures although the load at failure was significantly greater for polydioxanone than barbed GTC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The absence of a knot is proposed to decrease tissue reaction due to a reduced knot volume and barbed suture has been suggested as an alternative to conventional suture for all soft tissue closures where absorbable suture material is appropriate . Biomechanical studies comparing barbed and monofilament sutures in the dermis, gastro‐intestinal tract, urinary bladder, diaphragm, abdominal wall, and tendon are reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absorbability is also a key consideration for barbed sutures. For abdominal wall closure, non-absorbable sutures appear to be the most appropriate, mimicking the mechanical forces of healthy tissue [16]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of barbed suture in laparoscopic surgery comprising 1991 gynecologic patients demonstrated a significantly shorter duration of suturing with barbed sutures (3.9-13 min) compared to smooth sutures (6.2-20.4 min) during hysterectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, various approaches have been made to optimize the surgical technique, for example for midline laparotomy closure [2,3,4]. Finally, the choice of the optimal suture material determining the foreign body reaction is at least as important but is still under discussion [5]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%