2014
DOI: 10.1364/oe.22.018849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short and robust directional couplers designed by shortcuts to adiabaticity

Abstract: We propose short and robust directional couplers designed by shortcuts to adiabaticity, based on Lewis-Riesenfeld invariant theory. The design of directional couplers is discussed by combining invariant-based inverse engineering and perturbation theory. The error sensitivity of the coupler is minimized by optimizing the evolution of dynamical invariant with respect to coupling coefficient/input wavelength variations. The proposed robust coupler devices are verified with beam propagation simulations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen and Muga, 2012a; Kiely and Ruschhaupt, 2014) and four-level systems (Güngördü et al, 2012;Herrera et al, 2014;Kiely et al, 2016), or Hamiltonians quadratic in creation and annihilation operators (Stefanatos and Paspalakis, 2018a). They are also very useful to design motional dynamics in harmonic traps or otherwise.…”
Section: ;mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Chen and Muga, 2012a; Kiely and Ruschhaupt, 2014) and four-level systems (Güngördü et al, 2012;Herrera et al, 2014;Kiely et al, 2016), or Hamiltonians quadratic in creation and annihilation operators (Stefanatos and Paspalakis, 2018a). They are also very useful to design motional dynamics in harmonic traps or otherwise.…”
Section: ;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a hybrid strategy has been explicitly worked out to engineer spin like systems (Hegerfeldt, 2013;Sun et al, 2017;Zhou et al, 2017a), to minimize final excitation after a fast transport in the presence of anharmonicities , to ensure fast transport with extra relevant constraints (e.g. minimum transient energy, bounded trap velocity, or bounded distance from the trap center) Amri et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2011b;Stefanatos and Li, 2014;, to ensure a fast and robust shuttling of an ion with noise (Lu et al, 2014d), to perform fast expansions (Boldt et al, 2016;Lu et al, 2014c;Plata et al, 2019;Salamon et al, 2009;Stefanatos, 2013Stefanatos, , 2017bStefanatos et al, 2010), or to drive a many-body Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick system (Campbell et al, 2015).…”
Section: G Optimal Control and Shortcuts To Adiabaticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The essence of STA is that it drives the system to the same final state as a slow adiabatic process but in a much shorter time, since it does not necessarily follow the instantaneous eigenstates. It has been exploited to efficiently perform various tasks in several fields of optics [15][16][17][18][19]. Here, we show that STA can take advantage of the large enhanced nonlinearity and lead to a substantially larger amount of entanglement, compared to that obtained in the recent work [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…1(a) and the other one located downstream being a three-waveguide adiabatic passage structure (AC2). AC2 is used to further spatially transfer the TM-polarized wave transmitted from AC1 through waveguide a to the outer waveguide g mediated by single slash waveguide f. In AC2, the two outer waveguides are tapered in opposite direction to effectively shorten the adiabatic coupling length (L AC2 = 15 mm), as suggested by the "shortcut to adiabaticity" technique [32], for reducing the total length of the device. An interesting comparison can be made to a 50mm long, three-waveguide adiabatic coupler built in Ti:LiNbO 3 reported in [23] without using the taper waveguide design.…”
Section: Device Design and Performance Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%