2018
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-2018-48
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Communication: Increasing vertical attenuation length of cosmogenic nuclide production on steep slopes negates topographic shielding corrections for catchment erosion rates

Abstract: Abstract. Interpreting catchment-mean erosion rate from in situ produced cosmogenic 10Be concentration in stream sands requires calculating the catchment-mean 10Be surface production rate and effective mass attenuation length, both of which can vary locally due to topographic shielding and slope effects. The most common method for calculating topographic shielding accounts only for the effect of shielding at the surface, leading to catchment-mean corrections of up to 20 % in steep landscapes, and makes the sim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimated catchment average bedrock lowering rates from the measurements of 10 Be and 26 Al using the CRONUS‐Earth online calculators (Balco et al., 2008). In our calculations, we used catchment average elevations that were estimated using the LiDAR DEM and neglected topographic shielding (DiBiase, 2018). We used bedrock bulk densities of 2.65 g cm −3 and a nuclide‐dependent scaling framework (Lifton et al., 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated catchment average bedrock lowering rates from the measurements of 10 Be and 26 Al using the CRONUS‐Earth online calculators (Balco et al., 2008). In our calculations, we used catchment average elevations that were estimated using the LiDAR DEM and neglected topographic shielding (DiBiase, 2018). We used bedrock bulk densities of 2.65 g cm −3 and a nuclide‐dependent scaling framework (Lifton et al., 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ice cover and associated shielding have probably varied significantly since 6 Ma, with an apparent impact remaining in the range of our uncertainties. We included neither topographic shielding 66 nor paleomagnetic variation corrections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this optional correction must be used with caution. Indeed, DiBiase () suggests that the topographic shielding correction is inappropriate in many settings. According to this author, the correction is only needed for steep catchments with non‐uniform distribution of quartz and/or erosion rate.…”
Section: Discussion and Implementation In Basingamentioning
confidence: 99%