2020
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Message Service reminders reduce outpatient colonoscopy nonattendance rate: A randomized controlled study

Abstract: Background and Aim: Nonattendance of outpatient colonoscopy leads to inefficient use of health-care resources. We aimed to study the effectiveness of using Short Message Service (SMS) reminder prior in patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy on their nonattendance rate. Methods: Patients who scheduled for an outpatient colonoscopy and had access of SMS were recruited from three clinics in Hong Kong. Patients were randomized to SMS group and standard care (SC) group. All patients were given a written appo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients who are on long waiting lists may forget their appointments. This result supports the use of appointment reminders by phone [13] or text message, [14] which have been shown to increase attendance rates for endoscopy units appointments. Moreover, patients may think that they do not need the procedure because their complaints subside during the waiting period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Patients who are on long waiting lists may forget their appointments. This result supports the use of appointment reminders by phone [13] or text message, [14] which have been shown to increase attendance rates for endoscopy units appointments. Moreover, patients may think that they do not need the procedure because their complaints subside during the waiting period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As shown in Table 2 , as the primary outcome, all studies (n = 21) reported adequate bowel preparation rates. Eleven of the studies [ 12 , 13 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 22 24 , 33 , 34 , 37 ] were in the low-ratio group(the adequate bowel preparation rate in the control group was less than 70%), and the remaining ten studies [ 7 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 20 , 21 , 32 , 35 , 36 , 38 ] were in the high-ratio group (the adequate bowel preparation rate in the control group reached or exceeded 70%) ( Table 2 ). As shown in Fig 3 , supplemental education increased adequate bowel readiness by 10.47% (60.53% to 71.9%, p< 0.00001) in the low-ratio group, but only 4.53% (82.67% to 87.20, p = 0.003) in the high-ratio group.…”
Section: Primary Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of nine studies [ 12 , 14 , 16 , 23 , 24 , 33 , 35 37 ] completed in the USA shows that supplementary education can significantly improve the rate of adequate bowel preparation for outpatients (72.1% vs 67.6%, RR:1.09, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.19, I 2 = 65%, p = 0.03) ( S6B Fig ). A subgroup analysis based on studies in China [ 7 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 32 , 34 ] (RR:1.19, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.28, I 2 = 78%, p <0.00001) and Spain [ 17 , 20 , 21 ] (RR:1.03, 95%CI: 1.01 to 1.06, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.007) also showed that supplementary education can significantly increase the rate of adequate bowel preparation (China: 78.7% vs 68.7% and Spain: 88.8% vs 85.8%) ( S6B Fig ).…”
Section: Subgroup Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations