Short-term and long-term survival in critical patients treated by helicopter emergency medical services in Finland: a registry study of 36 715 patients

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe the short-term and long-term mortality of patients treated by prehospital critical care teams in Finland.Design and settingWe performed a registry-based retrospective study that included all helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) dispatches in Finland from 1 January 2012 to 8 September 2019. Mortality data were acquired from the national Population Register Centre to calculate the standardised mortality ratio (SMR).ParticipantsAll patients encountered by Finnish HEMS crews during the study period were included.Main outcomesMortalities presented at 0 to 1 day, 2 to 30 days, 31 days to 1 year and 1 to 3 years for different medical reasons following the prehospital care. Patients were divided into four groups by age and categorised by gender. The SMR at 2 to 30 days, 31 days to 1 year and 1 to 3 years was calculated for the same groups.ResultsPrehospital critical care teams participated in the treatment of 36 715 patients, 34 370 of whom were included in the study. The cumulative all-cause mortality at 30 days was 27.5% and at 3 years was 36.5%. The SMR in different medical categories and periods ranged from 23.2 to 72.2, 18.1 to 22.4, 7.7 to 9.2 and 2.1 to 2.6 in the age groups of 0 to 17 years, 18 to 64 years, 65 to 79 years and ≥80 years, respectively.ConclusionsWe found that the rate of mortality after a HEMS team provides critical care is high and remains significantly elevated compared with the normal population for years after the incident. The mortality is dependent on the medical reason for care and the age of the patient. The long-term overmortality should be considered when evaluating the benefit of prehospital critical care in the different patient groups.

Cerebral oxygen desaturation events during and functional outcomes after prehospital anaesthesia: A prospective pilot study

“…Furthermore, a sufficient length of follow‐up is important. We have recently reported significant over‐mortality in patients treated by HEMS teams compared to the normal population, even 1‐to‐3 years after a critical incident 19 . In the current study, we observed a low frequency of severe disability in the survivors.…”

“…We have recently reported significant over-mortality in patients treated by HEMS teams compared to the normal population, even 1-to-3 years after a critical incident. 19 In the current study, we observed a low frequency of severe disability in the survivors. The HRQoL in this study was higher than recently reported-for example, in patients with Parkinson's disease or head and neck cancer.…”

Association between case volume and mortality in pre-hospital anaesthesia management: a retrospective observational cohort

“…Previous studies have shown that the Finnish HEMS treat many intoxication cases with low mortality. 16 , 23 Because this might introduce bias and limit generalisability, we performed a sensitivity analysis excluding all intoxication patients. All the other factors remained identical to the original model in these sensitivity analyses.…”

The effect of time of measurement on the discriminant ability for mortality in trauma of a pre-hospital shock index multiplied by age and divided by the Glasgow Coma Score: a registry study

“…The need for airway management during the pre-hospital phase was included in the analyses, as this has been shown to be strongly associated with subsequent mortality in this population [ 13 ]. In this study, tracheal intubation or the placement of a supraglottic airway device was considered advanced airway management.…”