2002
DOI: 10.1648/0273-8570-73.2.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term effects of tartar emetic on re-sighting rates of migratory songbirds in the non-breeding season

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Poulin and Lefebvre 1995;Robert et al 1997;Johnson et al 2002). No side effects of the method were observed by me and no negative symptoms directly after single or multiple administration of the emetic were recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Poulin and Lefebvre 1995;Robert et al 1997;Johnson et al 2002). No side effects of the method were observed by me and no negative symptoms directly after single or multiple administration of the emetic were recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some, however, reported a low death rate of <3% (Poulin and Lefebvre 1995;Johnson et al 2002). Mortality caused by emetics can, however, be high, depending on the species involved, the dosage applied, and stress during handling (Rosenberg and Cooper 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The birds were placed in a cardboard box for 30 min and then released. This method allowed diet analysis with low mortality rates (Robinson and Holmes, 1982;Poulin et al 1994abc, Mallet-Rodrigues et al 1997, but see Jonson et al (2001). All the birds induced to regurgitate survived to release, and two of them were recaptured.…”
Section: Diet Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Johnson et al. () reported significantly lower resighting rates of treated than untreated birds for three species of warblers (61.5% vs. 13.2%), whereas Poulin et al. (), Durães and Marini (), and Carlisle and Holberton () found no significant differences between return rates of treated and untreated birds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite being effective at inducing regurgitation (60.5–89.8% of treated birds; Poulin and Lefebvre , Johnson et al. , Durães and Marini , Lopes et al. , Carlisle and Holberton , Diamond et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%